Whereas Locke spoke of life, liberty and estate, the Declaration of Independence speaks in terms of life, liberty, and the <u>pursuit of happiness</u><u>.</u>
In John Locke's way of framing his theory, "life, liberty, and estates" all constitute an individual's personal property. We normally think of "property" just in terms of one's "estate" -- that is land, house, belongings. From Locke's perspective, however, our property is <u>everything</u> that belongs to us as persons, which begins with our personhood itself. Having life and personal liberty -- those are the most important things we possess. Then comes "estate" or our land, house, belongings.
Thomas Jefferson's words in the Declaration of Independence have a similar theme, though worded differently. Pursuing happiness--a meaningful and fulfilling life--cannot happen unless life and liberty are respected and protected first.
I’ll give you two:
Yes: The “War” on the Indians was not a traditional war of declaration but of skirmishes. When wagon trains of people headed West Indians would commonly target them for raids and pillage, so along many routes forts where built and patrols would try and make sure they were safe. If the problem became worse the local garrison would find the tribe and come with a list of demands. Most of the time they were fired upon arrival out of fear or anger. This would lead to a small battle or skirmish which would likely cause collateral damage.
No: The wars raged in the west against the Indians were that of near genocide, and to call it anything but is misleading. To claim that the slaughter of hundreds of innocent people was a “battle” is absurd and shouldn’t be considered. Though in films that depict such events are dramatized and inaccurate, situations much like those were taking place around the west yearly.
Answer:
New Hampshire,Massachusetts,Rhode Island,and Conneticut.
Explanation:
The Founding Fathers knew that in the upcoming future with the changing time, there would be a need of change in the US government that would stand for the upcoming generations.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The affirmation of Independence had a presumption that people possesses a Right of Revolution. So in order to avoid any riot, they included amendment that offered a method to pursuit the Right of Revolution without any resort to arms and initiated the power in order to change the Constitution to the place it belongs to with the people. The Founding Fathers made the amendment procedure difficult to achieve because to look in the political leads which created the ratification of the constitution. They believed and recognized that the 'ground rules' should be constant in order for a government to function well.
World War I is called a "total war" because all aspects of the country's involved were included. This means that the economies, population, and governments were invested like never before. I AM VERY SMART AND I KNOW MY ANSWERS!!!!! PLEASE DO NOT DOUBT MY ANSWERS. THANK YOU VERY MUCH!!!!!!!!!
