Answer:
should be c
Explanation:
Umm pretty self explanatory
The correct answer is D) They controlled more of their own planning and finances.
Tenant farmers needed to be better at managing money than sharecroppers because they controlled more of their own planning and finances.
After the abolition of slavery at the end of the Civil War and during the time of Reconstruction, Southern landowners rented portions of the farm field to former slaves in order to work and produce cash crops. The new system was called "sharecropping."Farmers in exchange had to give the landlord a big portion of the crops. That is why tenants had to be very careful and better at managing money than sharecroppers because they controlled more of their own planning and finances. It was a matter of establishing good control and operative procedures.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
Do the economic benefits of free trade outweigh the social costs?
Not really, and it all depends on the perspective.
From the big companies and industrial side, free trade has been a success. Free trade has allowed thousands of companies to export their goods with cero import tariffs, benefiting the income. It has allowed multinational companies to go abroad and establishing branches in different parts of the world, basically in underdeveloped nations.
Once there, they paid very low salaries, much less than what they should have paid in their former countries, That is a reason why they moved to underdeveloped countries. So cheap labor is one reason. And other these multinational companies freely exploit the many raw materials and natural resources of that underdeveloped country.
Meanwhile, free trade makes rich people and corporations richer, and poor countries and poor people continue to be as poor as they have always been. No serious progress at all,
Answer Public places had separate facilities for black people and white people
Explanation:
you didnt give the answers
Answer:
"teachers” were deceived and frequently subjected to stress.
Explanation:
The Milligram's experiment consisted of participants or "teachers" that were told to administer an electric shock every time the "learner" (that teachers were not conscious that were not actual participants) made a mistake, this electric shock was stronger each time and when the teacher stopped he was instructed to continue. <em>This experiment was controversial because teachers were deceived and pushed to keep on going.</em>
I hope you find this information useful and interesting! Good luck!
