Answer:
VVVVVVWealthy townspeople who made up the middle class did not like owing taxes or serving in the noble’s army, so they forced nobles to grant them basic rights. Two examples are:
Wealthy townspeople who made up the middle class did not like owing taxes or serving in the noble’s army, so they forced nobles to grant them basic rights. Two examples are:
Wealthy townspeople who made up the middle class did not like owing taxes or serving in the noble’s army, so they forced nobles to grant them basic rights. Two examples are:
Wealthy townspeople who made up the middle class did not like owing taxes or serving iny, so they forced nobles to grant them basic rights. Two examples are:
Wealthy townspeople who made up the middle class did not like owing taxes or serving in the noble’s army, so they forced nobles to grant them basic rights. Two examples are:
Explanation:
This is a question that refers to philosophical utilitarianism.
It is the search for the maximum happiness and pleasure, with the least possible suffering, but with an implicit moral question. When we are led to the feeling of pain or pleasure, we determine the way forward and know what is right or wrong.
In this way, it is possible that we are facing a moral dilemma. In our quest for happiness or minimizing our pain, our actions can impact others. That is, utilitarianism is essentially a teleological and consequentialist theory. Therefore, we must seek the impartial maximization of the happiness of all affected by our attitudes, regardless of the affective ties.
I believe the answer is: started the revolt which eventually became the war of independence
In the beginning, he came to Mexico to help the poor people in farming olives and grapes in order to improve their economy.
But the effort was banned by the Spanish Government since they want mexican people to grow other crops that suitable for their export business.
This caused people became enraged and started the war of independence led by Miguel Hidalgo himself.
Answer:
Because every society needs to vary to explain uncommon phenomenon and deviance. Saying evil in people is innate makes the deviance into something that is not the product of the flaws in society, but the natural course of things.
Explanation:
All people and cultures need to understand the phenomenons around them, especially when they are uncommon and don’t fit the norm. <u>The notion of evil, deviance, and wrongdoing is something negative in every culture</u><u>, even though what belongs to that category differs.</u> However, all societies want to explain where deviance comes from.
One of the easiest explanations that can be offered is that evil is innate and the product of nature. <u>When evil is understood as a product of nature, it can carry the idea that something is wrong with society, and that something malignant exists in the organization and institution that can produce evil.</u>
<u></u>
It is much more secure for the existing system to see evil as the natural and inborn product that universally exists.
