Answer:
if a citizen feels that he or she does not fit in with the community that citizen can apply for elsewhere and disappear but Jonas cannot imagine that person feeling that he or she did not fit in because she Community is so well ordered
Well if the characters in the story know about an apocalypse then they should prepare for what could happen. they should use the knowledge of what they know about the apocalypse, they should use that knowledge and prepare.
Answer: the impasta Mario strikes back
Explanation:
Answer:
Credible evidence
Explanation:
Eyewitness accounts – this is not the right answer. There is actually no eyewitness in that specific sense of the word when it comes to literal work.
Personal narrative – this is not correct. The analysis is a scientific method and it should not use personal accounts. Therefore, the personal narrative is not the analysis.
<u> Credible evidence – this is the correct answer.</u> <u>When trying to do the literal analysis one should use as objective facts as possible.</u> This means they should note facts, <u>such as the name of the author, the name of the work, publisher, etc. </u>All these are credible evidence that can be easily confirmed and which are objective.
Alternate ending – this is not the right answer. The point of the analysis is not to change the narrative or speculate, so an alternative ending should not be included.
Answer:
Writers use parallel structure in the words and phrases in their sentences. This grammatical form can be used with a variety of structures including infinitives, words, clauses and lists. Parallel structure should be used when you connect clauses with a coordinating conjunction such as: for, and, nor, or, but, so, or yet. Some examples of this include:
Correct: Every morning, we make our bed, eat breakfast and feed the dog.
Incorrect: Every morning, we make our bed, eating breakfast and feed the dog.
Correct: I will not sing a song, nor will I dance.
Incorrect: I will not sing a song, nor dance
