The options available are:
A. Import oriented economy
B. Lack of infrastructure
C. Problems with immigration
D. Civil wars
Answer:
B. Lack of infrastructure
D. Civil wars
Explanation:
Lack of infrastructure in Africa is one of the major problem that prevents Africa from being able to fully utilize its resources, this because there is not massive and robust factory infrastructures that can process many of its natural resources into refined and final resources. For example, in terms of crude oil and natural gas, there is no substantial refinery in Africa to process it to final products.
Civil wars is also one of the bane that is preventing the Africa from harnessing its resources, as civil wars leads to vandalization of the little infrastructures that is present there, it also affects the government policies, destroys human lives or resources, and scare away both local and foreign investors.
Immigration problems has nothing to do with the utilization of resources, as many Nldeveloped Nations faced the same problems, such as USA with the influx of Mexicans trooping into the country for greener pastures.
It is not import oriented economy either, because, import oriented economy is also one of the byproducts of lack of infrastructure.
Answer:
What are the options bruv?
Explanation:
you need to show the options
When you say physical capital, it refers to the additional machinery, building, space etc.
Therefore an example of changing physical capital is B. Building extra space in the factory. By doing this, you are adding additional physical location in where your employee or worker can work.
Answer:
Debra Medina claimed that nullification was possible by state laws that could neutralize federal laws. She based her claim on the 10th Amendment, which establishes that any power not constitutionally granted to the federal government can be held by the states.
Explanation:
The Constitution doesn´t enable the nullification of federal laws by the states, and several academics have stated that it could be illegal since the Supremacy Clause pronounces federal laws as the supreme national law. So nullification would overthrow the constitutional interpretation held for 200 years.
Let us also remember that Gov. Rick Perry, who supported nullification, had already skipped the nullification issue by starting a debate about secession. This debate is a reminder of the time when state rejection of racial integration had to be stopped by the Supreme Court case Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka.
