Answer:
<h2>the answer is in the pics .....</h2>
<h2>hope it helps..</h2>
In order to answer this question, I will use two different perspectives of ethics: the consequentialist perspective, and the deontological perspective.
Consequentialism argues that the morality of an action lies with its consequences. This means that an action with bad consequences is an immoral action, and vice versa. In this case, killing the last remaining Redwood would not have any negative consequence on any being in the world, as no one benefits from it anymore. This means that the act is not immoral.
A deontological perspective states that there are principles that should be taken as rules, and which govern what is right and what is wrong. Therefore, rules and duties are central. For example, a principle might state that "all life is valuable." As the Redwood falls under the definition of life, killing it would be considered an immoral action.
The US government is based on ideas of limited government, including natural rights, popular sovereignty, republicanism, and social contract.
people have the final saying in government decision
hopefully this help
Answer:
<em><u>C. Investing in new roads in a poor city</u></em>
Explanation:
Domestic means "at home" so domestic policy would be something inside the country, county, district etc. while foreign would be something outside.
Hope this helps!
The correct answer is A). The West Coast.
As seen on the <em>County Emissions map of Air Pollutants in te U.S</em>., California produces so much air pollution in comparison to other U.S. regions. <u>The West coast of California has the highest ozone levels.
</u>
The cities in California where there are the highest levels of smog are Los Angeles-Long Beach area, Fresno, and Bakersfield. Probably 80% to 90% ninety percent of people in California live in regions with polluted air.
