I don't see any answers in the list that are fully correct.
Henry IV did not create the Estates General. That institution had developed already in medieval France, fell out of use, but then was revived during the latter half of the 16th century, a couple decades before Henry IV came to the throne.
Henry IV did not oppress the French people but sought to build roads and improve agriculture for the betterment of France and to build the loyalty of the people to his rule.
He did overthrow the previous ruler (Henry III), but not in "totalitarian fashion." After winning the "War of the Three Henrys" in order to become king, Henry sought to bring France to peace after religious warfare. He had been Protestant but converted to Catholicism for the sake of national peace, while at the same time extending legal protections to the Protestant minority.
Under Henry IV's rule, the central government did not control "almost every aspect of life." He worked hard to consolidate and centralize power for his government, but he was not yet what we would call an "absolute" ruler.
Answer:
they went to war and fought in the military but didnt have the right to vote on a leader
1.D
2.A
3.Can't help ya with that one sorry.
The relation between the France and England changed after the first world war as French wanted to protect itself from the Old rival Germany.
<h3>What was First world war?</h3>
First world war was the war between the central powers and the allies. The central powers includes the countries like Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey and Allies includes the countries like France, Great Britain, Russia, Italy, Japan and United nations.
The first world war began in 1914 and ended in 1918. With the beginning of the war, french and England were fighting together as the supporters of each other which led to the end of rivalry between the nations.
The french was terrified with the aggression of the old rival Germany and therefore it improved the relation with the Great Britain.
Learn more about world war here:
brainly.com/question/1449762
#SPJ1
Answer:
Actually yes it could have.
Explanation:
The only compromise that could have headed off war by then was for the Southern states to forgo secession and agree to abolition. Once the Confederate states seceded and troops fired on Fort Sumter, the only solution possible was complete Southern surrender.
