1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Elis [28]
2 years ago
9

Imagine that after the narrative, Tessa returns home and plans a new film. She writes a script that she loves. The only actor wh

o can work with her schedule seems wrong for the main character’s role. He is a great actor, but Tessa knows her script does not play to his strengths.  Given what Tessa learned in the story, which statements describe how she is likely to react to these obstacles?  Select True or False for each statement. True False Tessa understands that flexibility is necessary, so she will revise the script so the main character fits the available actor better. Tessa will dismiss the actor from the project because he is not right for the role and does not fit her plan.  Tessa will rush to find an actor who can portray the character the way she had originally planned.  Tessa will take the available actor’s strengths into account when she alters her plan.
English
1 answer:
Yanka [14]2 years ago
4 0

1. Tessa knows that flexibility is essential, so she would revise the whole script so that the central character suits the actor available.

This statement is TRUE

2. Tessa would refuse the actor in the project as he might not be right for the character's role and might not fit the plan.

This is FALSE

3. Tessa would rush to search for an actor who can play the character the same way she originally planned.

Another FALSE statement, as the paragraph proves that there is no other actor available.

4. Tessa might take the available actor’s sttong characteristics into account if she changes her plan.

TRUE.


Improvization is essential in every task and for a script-writer, it is becomes an utmost priority to favor what he/she currently has. This saves time and is considered very promising for future.

You might be interested in
Help me please help going to church
prohojiy [21]
A person named Fulton had a folly and it became his success
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The part of a plot that usually takes up the most time is....... Narrative hook, resolution, climax, rising action
Alisiya [41]

Answer:

rising action

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Which example of dialogue is formatted correctly? A. “Sometimes you win” the coach said, “And sometimes you lose.” B. “Sometimes
Travka [436]

Answer:

C.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When jefferson writes that the king has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable and distant from the
spayn [35]

b. hyperbole

the author is exaggerating the situation

7 0
3 years ago
Is violence ever justified? argumentative essay​
djverab [1.8K]

Answer:

Violence is a central concept for describing social relationships among humans, a concept loaded with ethical and political significance. In some, probably most, circumstances it is evident that violence is unjust; but, some cases appear more debatable to someone’s eyes: can violence ever be justified?

As Self-Defense

The most plausible justification of violence is when it is perpetrated in return of other violence. If a person punches you in the face and seems intentions to keep doing so, it may seem justified to try and respond to the physical violence.

It is important to notice that violence may come in different forms, including psychological violence and ​verbal violence. In its mildest form, the argument in favor of violence as self-defense claims that to violence of some sort, an equally violent response may be justified. Thus, for instance, to a punch you may be legitimate to respond with a punch; yet, to mobbing (a form of psychological, verbal violence, and institutional), you are not justified in replying with a punch (a form of physical violence).

In a more audacious version of the justification of violence in the name of self-defense, violence of any kind may be justified in reply to the violence of any other kind, provided there is a somewhat fair use of the violence exercised in self-defense. Thus, it may even be appropriate to respond to mobbing by using physical violence, provided the violence does not exceed that which seems a fair payoff, sufficient to ensure self-defense.

An even more audacious version of the justification of violence in the name of self-defense has it that the sole possibility that in the future violence will be perpetrated against you, gives you sufficient reason to exercise violence against the possible offender. While this scenario occurs repeatedly in everyday life, it is certainly the more difficult one to justify: How do you know, after all, that an offense would follow?

Violence and Just War

What we have just discussed at the level of individuals can be held also for the relationships between States. A State may be justified to respond violently to a violent attack – be it physical, psychological, or verbal violence to be at stake. Equally, according to some, it may be justifiable to respond with physical violence to some legal or institutional violence. Suppose, for instance, that State S1 imposes an embargo over another State S2 so that inhabitants of the latter will experience tremendous inflation, scarcity of primary goods, and consequent civil depression. While one may argue that S1 did not impart physical violence over S2, it seems that S2 may have some reasons for a physical reaction to S2.

Matters concerning the justification of war have been discussed at length in the history of Western philosophy, and beyond. While some have repeatedly supported a pacifist perspective, other author stressed that on some occasions it is unavoidable to wage wars against some offender.

Idealistic vs. Realistic Ethics

Explanation:

built diff

5 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Tim (participate) in three sports before the year is over. Choose the correct form of the verb in parentheses.
    14·2 answers
  • Which prefix when added to the root means to take out or leave out
    8·1 answer
  • Which situation is an example of internal conflict?
    6·2 answers
  • Which sentence correctly uses a colon? I edited the article and found: comma splices, sentence fragments, and misplaced modifier
    5·1 answer
  • A natural flow of water from underground to the surface is a/an
    12·2 answers
  • Which word best replaces "the rod" in the context of this biblical proverb? He who spares the rod hates his son, but he who love
    7·2 answers
  • Please help me with this <br><br> It is like a SUPER overdue
    5·1 answer
  • I WILL GIVE THE BRAINLYEST
    7·1 answer
  • Which audience is best suited for this informational text? To learn to draw, you need the right instruments. You can choose to l
    12·1 answer
  • I need help on this help me please
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!