I think yes he did in ball rolling in throw the ball 5_t+7t. yes maybe in be ball player in won
Answer:
C: {−5, 1)
Step-by-step explanation:
Starting with −2|−2x−4|=−12, divide both sides by -2:
|−2x−4| = 6
Reduce this by dividing all terms by 2:
|-x - 2| = 3
This is equivalent to x + 2 = 3 and x + 2 = - 3
Solving thse two equations, we get x = 1 and x = -5
And so the solution set is C: {−5, 1)
Answer:
The equation of the sphere with center (-2, 3, 7) and radius 7 is
.
The intersection of the sphere with the yz-plane is
.
Step-by-step explanation:
We know that any sphere can be represented by the following equation:

Where:
,
,
- Coordinates of the center of the sphere, dimensionless.
- Radius of the sphere, dimensionless.
If
and
, we obtain this expression:

The intersection of the sphere with the yz-plane observe the following conditions:
,
, 
Hence, the expression above can be reduced into this:

Answer:
Yes, double cosets partition G.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are going to define a <em>relation</em> over the elements of G.
Let
. We say that
if, and only if,
, or, equivalently, if
, for some
.
This defines an <em>equivalence relation over </em><em>G</em>, that is, this relation is <em>reflexive, symmetric and transitive:</em>
- Reflexivity: (
for all
.) Note that we can write
, where
is the <em>identity element</em>, so
and then
. Therefore,
. - Symmetry: (If
then
.) If
then
for some
and
. Multiplying by the inverses of h and k we get that
and is known that
and
. This means that
or, equivalently,
.
- Transitivity: (If
and
, then
.) If
and
, then there exists
and
such that
and
. Then,
where
and
. Consequently,
.
Now that we prove that the relation "
" is an equivalence over G, we use the fact that the <em>different equivalence classes partition </em><em>G.</em><em> </em>Since the equivalence classes are defined by
, then we're done.