The answer is Muckrakers They were dedicated to exposing what they saw as negative conditions in American society.
Andrew Jackson rejected the Worcester vs. Georgia ruling in hopes that the land they occupied would go to white settlers
Answer:
it afforded greater long-term security
Explanation:
<em> it offered more opportunities for job training </em>– this is not the correct answer. Slave apologists from the west didn’t care much for job training opportunities.
<em>it afforded greater long-term security</em> – <u>this is the correct answer. Southerners who apologized slavery thought slaves actually benefited from this way of life where someone offers them control</u>, plan for life, and structured job.<u> In their ideas, slaves would be lost, frightened, even irresponsible if they had freedom. By enslaving them, they believed they gave them security and stability.</u> This kind of life, they argued, is better than workers who had jobs and freedom in the North, as slaves had proper care and protection.
<em>it was actually a "freer" relationship</em> – this is not the correct answer. The southern apologists didn’t claim slaves were freer in this type of relationship, just that it was better for them.
<em>it included women in the workforce </em>– this is not the case. The problem of women's work rights was not mentioned at the time.
The response of the United States to the treatment of Jews by Nazi regime was shocking because the treatment, the deaths, the conditions, and the skeleton-like people. The US also was horrify what they saw what the Nazi did to the poor Jews.
