1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Valentin [98]
3 years ago
5

Chambersburg Corp Between 2016 and 2017, Chambersburg sold some equipment that had an original cost of $57,500 . Which statement

is most likely true concerning transactions that must have occurred during the period?
a. Chambersburg also purchased additional equipment during the year.
b. The selling price of the equipment sold was reported with net sales.
c. The equipment that was sold had a book value of $12,500.
d. The equipment sold had not been reported with Chambersburg's property, plant and equipment.
Business
1 answer:
DedPeter [7]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

<em>Detailed Question lifted from google: </em>

<em>Use the information presented below for Chambersburg Corp for 2017 and </em>

<em>2016 to answer the questions that follow. Chambersburg uses the straight-line depreciation method. 2017 2016 Property, plant, and equipment $ 250,000 $190,000 Accumulated depreciation 100,000 85,000 Depreciation expense 62,500 47,500 Net sales 1,000,000 900,000 Average Total assets 625,000 475,000 Refer to the information for</em>

<em>Chambersburg Corp Between 2016 and 2017, Chambersburg sold some equipment that had an original cost of $57,500 . Which statement is most likely true concerning transactions that must have occurred during the period? </em>

<em>a. Chambersburg also purchased additional equipment during the year. </em>

<em> b. The selling price of the equipment sold was reported with net sales. </em>

<em> c. The equipment that was sold had a book value of $12,500. </em>

<em> d. The equipment sold had not been reported with Chambersburg's property, plant and equipment.</em>

<em />

The only applicable answer based on the question is A, <em>Chambersburg also purchased additional equipment during the year. </em>

Explanation:

A. Between 2016 and 2017 <em>Property, plant, and equipment increased by $60,000 (which is $250,000 minus $190,000)</em>

<em />

B. Between 2016 and 2017 Depreciation expense on <em>Property, plant, and equipment increased by $15,000 (which is $62,500 minus $47,500)</em>

<em />

<em>Meaning attributable depreciation to the new addition to PPE of $60,000 is actually $15,000.</em>

<em />

<em />

<em />

<em />

<em />

<em />

<em />

You might be interested in
To assess risk and return involved in a purchase decision, which practical questions should a potential buyer ask? Check all tha
vaieri [72.5K]
I believe the answer is: 

- What can go wrong?
This question is asked to find out the potential risk that may occur after purchasing the product.

- What is the likely return?
This question is asked to find out potential benefit from consuming the product

-Is the risk worth the return?
<span>The purchase should be made only if the potential benefit would outweigh potential risk

</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The current spot exchange rate is $1.55/£ and the three-month forward rate is $1.50/£. Based on your analysis of the exchange ra
Misha Larkins [42]

Answer:

b. Buy £1,000,000 forward for $1.50/£.

Explanation:

Let's say for instance, we agree to make purchase of €1,000,000 and then forward for $1.50/€ and we assume that the price turns out to become $1.62/€ in three months time, the expected profit will be $12,000 = €1,000,000 ($1.62 - $1.50)As we can see, answer d looks convincing from an accounting standpoint, but it is wrong because the question asks us to make money with a forward contract, not by holding a particular spot. The correct option should be option b.

4 0
3 years ago
Dean, the president of Billing &amp; Credit Company, promises to pay his employee Ewing, who is dangerously obese, $10 for every
Aliun [14]

Answer:

See the explanation below.

Explanation:

The court likely to rule in favor of Ewing.

The reason is that the enough consideration that gives backing to a promise in this case is generally the waiver of a legal right to eat to obesity as requested by the other party.

The evidence that Ewing has lost 154 pounds in weight over the stipulated period is a consideration that sufficient enough under the law. The payment of $10 pound that Ewing has lost is a promise. The fact that Ewing also benefit from the weight loss does not matter.

4 0
3 years ago
Parks Corporation is considering an investment proposal in which a working capital investment of $10,000 would be required. The
Lady_Fox [76]
I think is the answer c
5 0
3 years ago
Helen Weeks has worked for Bonne Consulting Group (BCG) as the executive secretary in the administrative department for nearly 1
elena55 [62]

Answer:

1.)  The internal controls which were missing are from the separation of responsibilities. There must have been in place an inner regulator were an individual works with advisers while alternative individual or unit take-care of the expense procedure, then somebody else allow expenses and then office should distribute the expenditures. There is an absence of inner controls as you can realize that the corporation amalgamated with a larger corporation and no one measured other accounts such as Jackson and company any longer.

2.)  With the lack of control, this offered Helen the chance to effect the fraud. With this presence said, she was talented to emulate sign receipts and spend the retailer’s expenditures. She were also the one in responsibility of office the initial and final of accounts. In short, she had several accountabilities that should have remained separated up better and had diverse individuals for the separations of the job. In addition, she needed a bank description from the corporation where she was capable to put the expenditures and pay individual expenditures.

3.)  The method this fraud might be noticed is the inspection squad can ask the bank for reports. They might also conference sellers. The accounting section should have ended sure they were doing the due diligence in dealers and corresponding the receipts with statements and expenditures.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • On October 1, Year 1, Jason Company paid $7,200 to lease office space for one year beginning immediately. What is the amount of
    5·1 answer
  • Coca-Cola was first marketed in the 1860s as a patent medicine, designed to offer the virtues of cocaine without the vices of al
    6·1 answer
  • A pension fund that begins with $500,000 earns 15% the first year and 10% the second year. At the beginning of the second year,
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT an end goal of BOTH quality improvement programs and continuous process improvement? Select one: a
    9·1 answer
  • When employees are unclear about work methods, scheduling, and performance criteria because others hold different ideas about th
    12·1 answer
  • Brief Exercise 4-09 At Raymond Company, the following errors were discovered after the transactions had been journalized and pos
    8·1 answer
  • The marginal benefit from consuming another unit of a good: equals the total benefit obtained from the consumption of all prior
    10·1 answer
  • In the month of March, Baldwin corporation received orders of 169 units at a price of $15 for the product boat. Baldwin uses the
    11·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer
    13·1 answer
  • January 1, 2021, Woody Forrest Corporation granted executive stock options to purchase 27,000 of its common shares at $7 each. T
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!