Answer:
The power of a court to review a law or an official act of a government employee for constitutionality is known as judicial review.
Explanation:
By means of judicial review the court decides whether a law or an official act of a government employee is in accordance with the US Constitution or violates or contradicts it. If the law or act is not in line with the Supreme Law, the law or act is directly declared unconstitutional and, therefore, null and void. The laws passed by Congress must observe the principles outlined in the US Constitution so as to be valid.
The Court established this doctrine in the case of Marbury v. Madison in 1803. It was the first time that the court declared a law unconstitutional.
The answer is D, brainliest?
Answer:
Article V of the Constitution provides two ways to propose amendments to the document. Amendments may be proposed either by the Congress, through a joint resolution passed by a two-thirds vote, or by a convention called by Congress in response to applications from two-thirds of the state legislatures.
Explanation:
Answer1:an international agreement, usually regarding routine administrative matters not warranting a formal treaty, made by the executive branch of the US government without ratification by the Senate Answer2: An executive agreement is an agreement between the heads of government of two or more nations that has not been ratified by the legislature as treaties are ratified. Executive agreements are considered politically binding to distinguish them from treaties which are legally binding
Answer:
Pearson v. Callahan
Explanation:
This was a case that was decided by the United States which would deal with the doctrine of qualified immunity.
Hope this Helps!
