It will never since how their high radiation but it would take about a 100 years by how it’s not life able anymore and giving it time for radiation to break down which is about 20,000 years.
The answer is A, homozygous donimant - although i have a feeling that the question you posed was not right, were both the parents meant to be homozygous? or should one be heterozygous? (it's just that would be a better question!)
:)
1. There would be an uncoupling of proton translocation and ATP synthesis. 2. ATP synthase would remain sensitive to Fo proton conduction inhibitors.
Adenosine di phosphate (ADP) and inorganic phosphate are used to create the energy storage molecule adenosine triphosphate (ATP) by a protein called ATP synthase (Pi). It is categorized as a ligase since it modifies ADP by forming a P-O link (phosphodiester bond).
A molecular device called ATP synthase. Energy-wise, the production of ATP from ADP and Pi is undesirable, and the process would typically go the other way.
A proton (H+) concentration gradient across the inner mitochondrial membrane in eukaryotes or the plasma membrane in bacteria drives this reaction forward by coupling ATP synthesis during cellular respiration to the gradient.
To know more about ATP synthase:
brainly.com/question/12454295
#SPJ4
This case is about the school board cancelling a school play that the students believed they had the right to perform. The school board's defense is that the play was not approved by them, and that it was inappropriate. The students say that they have a right of performing what they want, since it's freedom of speech.
The Hazelwood v Kuhlmeier case was about a principal deleting pages of a school newspaper. The reason that it was deleted was because the principal deemed it inappropriate for younger viewers, and because he felt that the anonymity of the people they were writing about was not sufficient. Both cases deal about a school supposedly censoring students and limiting their freedom of speech.
The reason that the school board felt that they had a right of cancelling the play was because they would perform it on school grounds, therefore any inappropriate actions would deem the school liable. They have certain authority over what events can take place on their property.
The reason that the students felt they had a right of performing the play was because they felt that through the play, they express themselves. Censoring their expression would be limiting their speech.
I believe that the students should be allowed to perform the play depending on whether all of their parents approve of it. If there are people who say that it is too inappropriate, then it should be censored. There may be younger audiences in the play that would get the wrong impression from the play. First of all, anything that happens to the students on school grounds makes the school responsible. Secondly, the parents have a right of determining what they expose their children to. Third, considering that the play is a school play, the school board has a right to cancel or change any part of a play that they feel needs to be changed.
(This last part comes down to your personal opinion so you can change it if you'd like.) Yes the school should be allowed to censor the material of a school play or school newspaper because it is school related. Yes, the students have a right of expressing themselves, however others also do have rights. Censorship should be expressed only if they have the approval of the majority of the parents involved and of the teachers.
Answer :he electrons generated from the Krebs Cycle are transferred to NAD+ and then sent to the Electron Transport Chain.
Explanation:
