True but I'm not sure that is a question
<span> Ivan is discussing with two of the monks his article on the position of the ecclesiastical courts. He explains that he opposes the separation of church and state primarily because when a criminal needs to be punished, the public should not have to rely on the state to administer such punishment. Ivan states that if the church had the authority to punish and also to excommunicate the criminal, then a vast number of crimes would be diminished. To a degree, Father Zossima agrees, but he points out that the only effective punishment "lies in the recognition of sin by conscience.</span>
Answer:
false
Explanation:
because it not how you don't know this find it than leave it don't get caute
Answer:Ethos, Pathos, Logos work together. They are effective only if the audience finds them persuasive. If the speaker/writer can convince the audience that he or she is credible, then ethos is persuasive. If the speaker/writer can incite emotion in the audience, then pathos is persuasive.
Explanation:
Have a great Day!
The counterclaim to the use of solar energy is the high cost of equipment in sentence 9. Thus, option D is correct.
Solar energy is the energy produced by the sun. It is a natural energy source and is nonrenewable.
<h3>What is the counterclaim for use of solar energy?</h3>
The claim is given as the argument that supports the use of energy. The counterclaim is the argument that is presented in opposition or against the claim.
The sentence that references as a counterclaim is the high cost of equipment. It is stated in sentence 9. Thus, the counterclaim to the use of solar energy is option D.
Learn more about counterclaims, here:
brainly.com/question/10185591
