Answer:
A. self-handicapping
Explanation:
In psychology, the term self-handicap refers to an strategy that people use in order to enhance the opportunity to attribute failure to external situations and not take responsibility for it. This strategy is used in order to protect our self-esteem (since we can attribute failure to external factors and not to our own abilities).
In this example, before an exam Marc tells you that he's tired because he partied the night before. We can see that, <u>by saying this, if he gets a bad grade, he can attribute it to the fact that he was tired because of the party </u>(which would be an external situation and therefore he won't attribute it to his lack of knowledge which would be an internal factor). Therefore, Marc is engaging in self-handicapping.
Answer:
The answer is scapegoating.
Explanation:
Scapegoating refers to blaming a single person or group of people for a negative outcome. The concept itself appears in the Bible, in which a goat or another animal was sacrificed for the sins of others.
Scapegoating may also occur to organizations and corporations. A simple example of scapegoating is blaming the media for real-world violence.
Answer:
- Cal is from a low-context culture and Medina is from a high-context culture.
Explanation:
As per the given details, it can be inferred that Cal most likely belongs to a low-context culture and Medina belongs to high-context culture. The key reason for this inference is that Cal displays direct and denotative communication while Medina is connotative and conveys her message indirectly and more through gestures, facial expressions, etc. Thus, Cal is unable to infer the actual meaning of her message as he comes from a culture that believes in stating thoughts directly instead of suggesting.
I believe you can get 0.87 with a 50 cent piece and 3 dimes and 7 pennies have a nice day (:
