All categories

3 years ago

Ceilings are thought to represent the level at which more difficult questions would not be passed.

1 answer:

4 0

Ceilings are thought to represent the level at which more difficult questions would not be passed is true since ceilings really do represent the level at which more difficult questions would not be passed.

If you have any other questions, please don’t hesitate to ask me.

You might be interested in

Tại sao sản lượng bằng thu nhập

Artist 52 [7]

Answer:

Khi một lượng sản lượng cụ thể được sản xuất, một lượng thu nhập giống hệt nhau được tạo ra bởi vì sản lượng đó thuộc về một người nào đó. Do đó, chúng ta có nhận dạng rằng đầu ra bằng thu nhập (trong đó danh tính là một phương trình luôn đúng bất kể giá trị của bất kỳ biến nào).

Explanation:

When a particular quantity of output is produced, an identical quantity of income is generated because the output belongs to someone. Thus we have the identity that output equals income (where an identity is an equation that is always true regardless of the values of any variables).

7 0

3 years ago

Most economists believe that in the long run, changes in the money supply Group of answer choices affect nominal but not real va

Ymorist [56]

Answer:

affect nominal but not real variables. This view that money is ultimately neutral is consistent with classical theory.

Explanation:

This idea is held by classical economists (not by most economists) since they believe in the quantitative theory of money:

MV = PQ

M = quantity of money
V = velocity of money
P = price level
Q = quantity of goods

Classical theory was abandoned 90 years ago (according to classical theory, recessions were not possible and couldn't exist, but then the Great Depression came and the impossible became true). Neo-classical or monetarists appeared in the 1960s, and lately, neo-neo-classical appeared with George W. Bush. The problem with the quantitative theory is that it needs the following things to be true in order to hold, and empirical evidence over the last 90 years showed that none of them are true:

the velocity of money has to be constant (AND IT IS NOT CONSTANT)
real output is independent on money supply (NOT TRUE)
causation goes from money to prices (MODERN ECONOMISTS BELIEVE IT IS THE OTHER WAY)

5 0

3 years ago

Presented below are two independent cases related to available-for-sale debt investments. Case 1 Case 2 Amortized cost $41,640 $

netineya [11]

Answer:

Case 1 = $9,420

Case 2 = 0

Explanation:

Determining the amount of impairment loss is given below:-

Case 1

Impairment loss = Amortized cost - Fair value

= $41,640 - $32,220

= $9,420

Case 2

Impairment loss = Amortized cost - Fair value

= 91,800 - $102,220

= 0

Since, the fair value is higher than Amortized cost so the value of Impairment loss in case 2 is 0.

5 0

3 years ago

Mission Foods produces two flavors of tacos, chicken, and fish, with the following characteristics:

postnew [5]

Answer:

1. $858,000

2. Chicken = 24,000 units and Fish = 36,000 units

Explanation:

The computation is shown below:

1. The anticipated level of profits for the expected sales volumes is

= Expected sales of chicken × (Selling price per taco - Variable cost per taco) + Expected sales of fish × (Selling price per taco - Variable cost per taco) - total fixed cost

= 200,000 × ($3 - $1.50) + 300,000 × ($4.50 - $2.25) - $117,000

= $300,000 + $675,000 - $117,000

= $858,000

2. The break even volume is

Let we assume the sale units be X

So, total units sold for chicken = 40X

And, for the fish it is = 60X

Sale units of chicken × (Selling price per taco - Variable cost per taco) + Sale units of chicken × (Selling price per taco - Variable cost per taco) = Total Fixed cost

0.40X × (3 – 1.50) + 0.60X × (4.50 – 2.25) = $117,000

0.60X + 1.35X = $117,000

1.95X = $117,000

So, the X is 60,000 units

So for chicken it is 60,000 × 40% = 24,000 units

And for fish it is 60,000 × 60% = 36,000 units

7 0

3 years ago

Suppose that Japan is considering placing trade restrictions on imports of U.S. pharmaceuticals. It could choose either a tariff

Mamont248 [21]

Answer:

1) Japanese buyers of pharmaceuticals.

Instead of focusing on U. S pharmaceuticals, we can look for Japanese buyers of pharmaceuticals. The fact should be acknowledged that if both the policies result in the same quantity which is being imported, then the price paid by the Japanese buyers will be identical as well.

2) Japanese producers of pharmaceuticals.

If both policies are resulting in the same quantity of the import, then the Japanese producers should be indifferent to which trade restriction is selected.

8 0

3 years ago