1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MAXImum [283]
3 years ago
7

Question 1 William Whipple, American Hero We are used to thinking of the American Founding Fathers as heroes. They took on the B

ritish Empire, the greatest military force at the time, and defied a king. As representatives of their home communities, they took great risks to draft a document explaining the reasons to seek independence. Speaking out against the king was considered treason and would have resulted in financial ruin and even death for anyone caught. For one of the signers of the Declaration of Independence, though, the act of signing was more than just the act of rebellion we know all the signers for. For William Whipple, the signing was a commitment to liberty that few signers lived up to. According to the book Lives of the Signers to the Declaration of Independence, William Whipple was born in Kittery, Maine, in 1730. William attended public school and took a job on a merchant ship shortly after finishing. His sea voyages were very successful, and when he retired from the sea he had made a small fortune. With that fortune, William became a successful businessman in Portsmouth before the Revolution. In part because of his success in business, he was elected to represent his community at the state congress. In 1775, he was selected as a delegate to the Continental Congress in Philadelphia. He participated in the congress, ultimately signing his name, with many others, to the document that launched the rebellion. War came shortly after the signing, and William was appointed to serve in the militia assigned to protect New Hampshire. At the time he began his military service, William owned a slave like most of his peers. The slave, named Prince, would have been expected to join William and serve with him in battle. As they were preparing to leave, Prince told William, "I have no freedom to fight for, sir." Seeing the truth in this, William is reported to have freed Prince immediately. Today, we look back on history through a great fog of time, and with lenses clouded by our own modern values. Our Founding Fathers displayed admirable courage in crafting and signing such a brilliant claim to human liberty. The idea that all people were created equal and endowed with certain rights was revolutionary in every way. The idea that government's job was to protect this equality and these rights was also revolutionary. We can admire the signers' commitment to these principals, and also know that the issue of slavery divided the nation from the signing until long after the end of the Civil War. We would perhaps have had a different history if more of the signers, like Whipple, had seen the cruel irony in declaring the oppression of Britain unjust and at the same time oppressing an entire race of people. How is the fact that William Whipple made a fortune at sea important to the point of the essay?
a It explains how he came to own only one slave.
b It gives him a sense of a rags-to-riches upbringing. c It indirectly helps him to enter into politics.
d It suggests that getting rich was easy at that time.
History
1 answer:
alex41 [277]3 years ago
4 0

Answer: c It indirectly helps him to enter into politics.

Explanation:

The main point of the essay is that the signers of the Declaration of Independence, like Whipple, were mostly wealthy men who, despite owning slaves themselves, understood that acknowledging Britain´s oppression involved principals of human liberty equality and with basic rights that were contrary to racial oppression.

In that sense, Whipple entering politics because of his wealthy status is important as an example of what every signer must have gone through.

You might be interested in
Mark Antony expertly used __________, or the language of persuasion, to provoke the Roman crowd into a riot. rhetoric characteri
igor_vitrenko [27]
Mark Antony expertly used rhetoric, or the language of persuasion, to provoke the Roman crowd into a riot. Antony was a very powerful speaker who held the attention of mass audiences.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
To what extent was president harry truman's policies a continuation of president franklin roosevelt's policies
natita [175]

With the death of President Franklin D. Roosevelt on April 12, 1945, Vice President Harry S. Truman assumed the Oval Office. He surely knew he faced a difficult set of challenges in the immediate future: overseeing the final defeats of Germany and Japan; managing the U.S. role in post-war international relations; supervising the American economy's transition from a war-time to a peace-time footing; and maintaining the unity of a fractious and powerful Democratic Party.


4 0
3 years ago
HELPPPPPOOP OMG HELPPPPPOOPPOPO
Ad libitum [116K]

Answer:

It is too far to read, please upload and I will answer :)

Explanation:

Aurangzeb did not respect his father and also throwed him to prison. Akbar was the third successor of the Bhabur the founder of the Mughal dynasty. Aurangzeb was the great grand son of Akbar and son of Shah jahan. Akabar did respected his parents and his Dynast and promoted the growth of his Dydnasty. He was one of the main reason why Mughal empire lost it’s power. Thus aurangzeb is totaly different from akbar. Mughal rulers', Akbar and Aurangzeb, policies were motivated by religious fluidity by Akbar who created a diverse, accepting, and highly successful empire while Aurangzeb's religious rigidity was the downfall of the Mughals. Akbar was very against having one religion in charge, eliminated the Jizya, made Persian the official language, established the Ibadat Khana and the Divine Faith in Fatehpur, combined religions. Aurangzeb returned to religious orthodoxy and reestablished the Jizya, resulted in revolts of sikhs and hindus and ultimately led to the downfall of the empire.

4 0
3 years ago
Which best explains how the structure of the executive office of the president helps fulfill Presidency’s office’s role?
algol13
The structure of the president's executive office was able to help the role of the office of the President because the office contains multiple and different levels of advisers and staff who are required to help the president in many areas. 
7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Classify according to the kind of telescope that this describes:
muminat

Answer:

refracting was invinted by lippershey

Explanation:

the reflecting telescope was invented by issac newton

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Explain how seats in the house of representatives are apportioned among the states.
    13·1 answer
  • What role did women play in the fields of science and math in the 1700's
    10·2 answers
  • Which big band leader wrote music considered to be in the classical realm? A. Miles Davis B. Thelonious Monk C. Count Basie D. D
    10·1 answer
  • Which best describes the extent of the Roman empire at it's height​
    10·2 answers
  • When was the 1 world war
    11·2 answers
  • True false: the word Caudillos means nobleman. They assisted the king.
    5·2 answers
  • 5. What did the German's claim these actions were in response to?
    6·1 answer
  • Prior to Muhammad, most Arabs practiced <br> . (polytheism/Sufism
    7·2 answers
  • 42. Which principle of democracy allows the people to limit the power of the president?
    10·2 answers
  • Select the correct answer.
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!