It is not fair in my opinion, because the 50 year old has already lived a life, where as the 20 year old hasn't. The 50 year old has already has done things in his or her life that the 20 year old won't be able to do. For example, when the 20 year old gets out of jail he will be 80 meaning he may never experience things such as getting married, having children, and etc. The 50 year old may have already done those things in his or her life, so it is very unfair to the 20 year old. The sentencing is also unfair due to the fact being both of them committed the crime and should have the same time served in jail.
Hint: that the last sentence might not hold up due to the fact of what he or she did and it pertains to how serve the crime was for both parties. Such as one person killed someone, while the other one didn't pull the trigger but was an accomplice or new about the killing. So it really depends on the crime or crimes the person has committed.
Answer:
Steve's costs are greater than his rewards.
Explanation:
The Social Exchange Theory, as it's name suggests, uses a cost-benefit analysis, which determines outcomes and relationships measured in costs, benefits and rewards from any type of interaction between two parties. This theory is used by both sociologists and psychologists to study the behavior of the two selected parties, groups or individuals. Now, in this case, Steve's costs are greater than his rewards given that he makes the effort to surpise Marla, going out of his way to try and make her happy. But, given that he feels that he is taken for granted, one could argue that, effectively, his costs are greater than his rewards.
Answer:
1. industrial pollution
2. people who were dumped in the river or buried on the banks after their families could not afford a proper cremation.
Explanation:
i hope this helps?
Answer:
i am doing this for points only
