Answer: A *For question 1* sry only one I looked at...also noticed the other person had 2 answers so I narrowed this one down
Explanation:
B is not right because it only focuses on the mind game they were talking about(only mentioned once)
C is not right because it has not been proved that you <em>can't </em>travel through the center of the Earth
(I'm assuming you got D wrong but just in case) I think it's safe to say that answer choice D is only a sum up of paragraph 2. *Basically it doesn't sum up the whole passage*
Answer:
Rachel Carson presents a convincing argument. She uses facts, examples, and expert opinions to appeal to logos to support her claim that pesticides are extremely destructive and only partially effective. She organizes her argument logically, establishing the dangers of pesticides and, then, examining the misuse of these chemicals. As she approaches the end of the argument, she appeals to pathos by using loaded language and vivid imagery. She clearly outlines her contentions and puts forth the call to action: the public needs to inform themselves in order to make a decision about how to proceed.
Explanation:
What is the poem? That would help me help you get an answer
