Answer:
I think your question is not complete..
can you write the question in a way which will determine in what way you want your answer..
i mean from what to find x..
Area is given as 285cm
what is 15 cm for?
from here where is x given to find?
We know that a rectangle is dilated by a factor of 1/5 which means that the area of a rectangle is dilated by a factor of 1/25. I get 1/25 because each side was dilated by a factor of 1/5, so I just need to take 1/5×1/5=1/25 as the factor of area if rectangle.
Then, the new rectangle is 4 square yards, so we just need to find the area of the old or pre-rectangle. Furthermore, we know that the pre-rectangle is 25 times bigger than the new rectangle based on what we did above, so the area of the pre-rectangle is:
4×25=100 square yards.
However, the question asked us to find the possibility dimension of the original images.
Area of the rectangle=
length× width
100 square yards
length=20 yards, width=5 yards
length=100 yards, width=1 yard
length=25 yards, width=4 yards. Hope it help!
9514 1404 393
Answer:
not tangent
Step-by-step explanation:
The triangle has side lengths 5, 12, 14. You can compute the "form factor" for the triangle:
a^2 +b^2 -c^2 . . . . . . . . where 'c' is the longest side
= 5^2 +12^2 -14^2
= 25 +144 -196 = -27
The negative value tells you this triangle is obtuse. If AB were a tangent, it would be perpendicular to the radius—the triangle would be a right triangle.
If you compare this calculation to the Pythagorean theorem, you see that the length AB is longer than the length √(25+144) = 13 that is necessary for the triangle to be a right triangle. That means the angle at A is greater than 90°.
__
<em>Additional comment</em>
This "form factor" calculation is part of the calculation you would do using the Law of Cosines to determine the largest angle. The sign of the "form factor" tells you the sign of the cosine of the angle. Angles whose cosine is negative are greater than 90°. A positive "form factor" indicates an acute triangle.
I find computing the "form factor" in this way makes interpretation of the result fairly easy. For me, it eliminates the confusion I had when the numbers of the Pythagorean theorem didn't add up. For me, it was too much work to figure whether the triangle was acute or obtuse, and I often got it wrong.
For those interested, the angle measure is arccos((a^2+b^2-c^2)/(2ab)). Here, that's arccos(-27/(2·5·12)) ≈ 103.003°.
Answer will be (D)
The value of the exponential function will eventually be greater than the
linear function.
and
B)
The value of the linear function will never be greater than the exponential
function
Answer:12.5
Step-by-step explanation: