1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ahat [919]
3 years ago
14

Liyah gets $5 for every “A” she receives on her report card. This situation BEST demonstrates which?

Advanced Placement (AP)
1 answer:
Scilla [17]3 years ago
3 0
This would be an example of primary reinforcement
You might be interested in
If you have not heard of Tom Macdonald you should listen to one of his songs!
atroni [7]

Explanation:

ok let me hear the song and I will tell u how it is ok

5 0
3 years ago
Can someonetell me something new they learn today. ​
Paha777 [63]

Answer:

That an African American man is the founder of BET

Explanation:

My Teacher

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following students is not using critical thinking in their study methods?
BabaBlast [244]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Forensic Anthropology Facility studies what?
JulsSmile [24]
The Forensic Anthropology Facility studies THE DECOMPOSITION OF HUMAN REMAINS. 
The anthropology facility is a research facility where decomposition of human bodies can be studied in a variety of settings. It also serves as a resource for forensic anthropology students and researchers. 
4 0
3 years ago
What is dispersal and elevation ?​
Kobotan [32]
Little is known about how mutualistic interactions affect the distribution of species richness on broad geographic scales. Because mutualism positively affects the fitness of all species involved in the interaction, one hypothesis is that the richness of species involved should be positively correlated across their range, especially for obligate relationships. Alternatively, if mutualisms involve multiple mutualistic partners, the distribution of mutualists should not necessarily be related, and patterns in species distributions might be more strongly correlated with environmental factors. In this study, we compared the distributions of plants and vertebrate animals involved in seed‐dispersal mutualisms across the United States and Canada. We compiled geographic distributions of plants dispersed by frugivores and scatter‐hoarding animals, and compared their distribution of richness to the distribution in disperser richness. We found that the distribution of animal dispersers shows a negative relationship to the distribution of the plants that they disperse, and this is true whether the plants dispersed by frugivores or scatter‐hoarders are considered separately or combined. In fact, the mismatch in species richness between plants and the animals that disperse their seeds is dramatic, with plants species richness greatest in the in the eastern United States and the animal species richness greatest in the southwest United States. Environmental factors were corelated with the difference in the distribution of plants and their animal mutualists and likely are more important in the distribution of both plants and animals. This study is the first to describe the broad‐scale distribution of seed‐dispersing vertebrates and compare the distributions to the plants they disperse. With these data, we can now identify locations that warrant further study to understand the factors that influence the distribution of the plants and animals involved in these mutualisms.

Introduction
A central problem in ecology is to understand the patterns and processes shaping the distribution of species. There is a preponderance of studies of species richness at broad geographic scales (Hawkins et al. 2003, Rahbek et al. 2007, Stein et al. 2014, Rabosky and Hurlbert 2015) that has facilitated our understanding of why species are found where they are, a central tenet within the domain of ecology (Scheiner and Willig 2008). Most commonly, these studies find species distributions to be correlated with resource availability and use environmental variables (e.g. temperature and productivity; Rabosky and Hurlbert 2015) to explain putative determinants of the distributions. Environmental variables are only one determinant of species’ distributions. Another, species interaction, is a key and understudied determinant of species’ distributions (Cazelles et al. 2016). In fact, in some cases species interactions may be more important for determining distribution than environmental variables (Fleming 2005).

When species interact, we expect their geographic distributions to be correlated – either positively or negatively – depending on the effect (or sign of the interaction) of one species on the other (Case et al. 2005). For pairwise interactions, where one species benefits from another species, a positive relationship is expected between the distribution and abundance due to the increase in the average fitness of the benefitting species where they overlap (Svenning et al. 2014). Furthermore, most species interactions are not simply pairwise, but diffuse, consisting of multiple interacting species, here referred to as guilds (with guilds referring to species that use the same resource). It therefore follows that where one guild benefits from another guild, a positive relationship is expected between the distribution and richness of the guids. This should be true in the case of mutualisms, where both sides of the interaction share an increase in average fitness from being together (Bronstein 2015), and there is some evidence for correlated geographic distributions of mutualists in the New World (Fleming 2005). One example of a mutualism where both sides of the interaction have a fitness advantage in each other's presence is animal‐mediated seed dispersal. Because both interacting species and guilds in seed dispersal mutualism benefit from the relationship we would predict that the richness of animal‐dispersed plants ought to be correlated with the richness of their animal dispersers and vice versa. To our knowledge, this prediction has never been tested on a large geographic scale.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following CSS properties were most likely used to style that image, if the web developer was using standard practic
    15·2 answers
  • When you view the pendulum’s swing, it shows that at the very top of the swing KE = 0. What does that tell you about the pendulu
    5·2 answers
  • In what ways did European migrants transfer familiar patterns and institutions to their colonies in the Americas, and in what wa
    9·1 answer
  • Cindy runs 2 kilometers every morning. She takes 2 minutes for the first 250 meters, 4 minutes for the next 1,000 meters, 1 minu
    13·2 answers
  • A loan available to parents of undergraduate students, graduate students, or professional students to help pay for post-secondar
    10·2 answers
  • What is the definition of ideological diffusion in human geography?
    12·1 answer
  • Styles Researchers asked 131 college students to listen to a recording of a 20-minute introductory physics lecture. The students
    8·1 answer
  • AP Psychology 2008 free-response
    15·1 answer
  • Im really bored right now
    15·2 answers
  • Ano -ano ang mga kailangang isaalang -alang sa pagsisimula ng negosyo ?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!