In third world countries, rivers are just as essential as they were since the dawn of civilizations. In modern countries, rivers serve as a waterway for transportation, human recreation, and sometimes drinking water.
A similar point between these colonies is how both were based on agriculture that served both food and commerce.
<h3>What were the differences?</h3>
- The colonials of New England focused on the export of wood.
- For this, these colonies had a very efficient transport system.
- The Chesapeake clones focused on tobacco production and export and on perennial crops that provided pasta for food.
Both colonies occupied and expelled indigenous villages, where they had to attack and suffer attacks from the natives due to the occupation of land. This changed the way of life of the natives and forced the creation of relationships between them and the settlers. Among these relationships, the Chesapeake colonies were more friendly, although they had to face some problems.
Learn more about the New England and Chesapeake colonies:
brainly.com/question/28337862
#SPJ1
Because Slate was more common in wet microclimates.
Hope I Helped :)
Answer:
While it was true that the cotton gin reduced the labor of removing seeds, it did not reduce the need for slaves to grow and pick the cotton. In fact, the opposite occurred. Cotton growing became so profitable for the planters that it greatly increased their demand for both land and slave labor
Explanation:
The States are allowed to find solution and make a decision about the issue. There are equal powers with the Federal and States therefore, the issue can be debated. Since federal powers are superior, the Constitution makes the decision. The national government shall create specific rules for each of the States.
