1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
alina1380 [7]
3 years ago
10

Which of these is NOT true about Alaskan Natives during the Baranov Era?

History
1 answer:
mr Goodwill [35]3 years ago
3 0
The answer is C The stability allowed aleut and alutiig populations to grow
You might be interested in
Please help i don’t know this!!
dimaraw [331]

See I can't say what it is but I think its A

4 0
3 years ago
Please help me.
nalin [4]

Answer:

c is your answer i huest

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were the central features of the "middle colonies"? Explain how they differed from New England and the southern colonies.
Pavel [41]

Answer:

The middle colonies, were different from the New England and southern colonies. These colonies are also known as, New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Deleware, which contained river systems and parts. Their 3 rivers are the Hudson, Deleware, and the Susquehanna. The New England colonies contained Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, and New Hampshire. They had harsh soil, which led to subsistence farms, fishing (including whaling), and shipbuilding/small-scale factories were introduced. In the Southern colonies (Maryland, Virginia, South Carolina, and Georgia), plantation systems developed. Farms were scattered, as well as slave labor, and export of cash crops.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
How was the Fifteenth Amendment both a success and a failure?
arlik [135]

Your answer would be:

C.It ended slavery, but it failed to guarantee the right to vote for African American men.

~<em>Luis~</em>

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statements are true of the Magna Carta? Choose all answers that are correct.
Nata [24]

Answer:

3. The Magna Carta guaranteed that the king could not impose new taxes without permission from a council.

1. English barons and church leaders wrote the Magna Carta because they could no longer tolerate King John's abuses of their traditional rights.

Another way to rephrase the first one is;

Among the many restrictions placed upon the King by the Nobles was the idea that the king could not impose taxes without the approval of the “common counsel” of the Kingdom:

Another way to rephrase the second one is;

The committee of Twenty Five were a group of barons in the forefront of the opposition to King John who were entrusted by the terms of clause 61 of Magna Carta to ensure the king’s compliance with its terms.

The church clergy that helped were Cathedral churches in Salisbury and Lincoln.

Explanation:

Justice

King John’s father, Henry II (r. 1154–89), introduced extensive judicial reforms, established the authority of the royal courts and laid firm foundations for the future system of justice in England. In contrast, John regularly abused the justice system to suppress his opponents and to extort revenue from the barons. The justice system and feudal law were two of the main themes addressed in Magna Carta, and the most famous clause dealt with justice:

No free man shall be seized or imprisoned, or stripped of his rights or possessions, or outlawed or exiled, or deprived of his standing in any other way, nor will we proceed with force against him, or send others to do so, except by the lawful judgement of his equals or by the law of the land.

The barons ensured that numerous other clauses in Magna Carta defined in more detail how the justice system and its officials were to operate. These clauses sought to remedy specific abuses by the king and to make the system more consistent, accessible and fair.

Magna Carta and peace

Many of the clauses towards the end of Magna Carta were practical arrangements for making peace. Rather than looking forward to how the king was to behave in the future, these clauses sought to put right the wrongs done by King John.

The king was immediately to return all hostages, to remove all foreign knights and mercenaries from England, to remit all fines exacted unjustly, and to restore lands, castles and liberties to all who had been wrongfully deprived of them. These clauses were not statements of legal principle, but they were a part of the peace-making process.

All the others are not true as King John had no choice at all.

Perhaps the most radical clause in Magna Carta was the 61st, which set up an elected commission of 25 barons to monitor the king’s compliance with the settlement and to enforce its terms. The 25 barons had the power to seize the king’s property in order to seek redress if he failed to keep the terms imposed on him. This innovative clause demonstrated the power invested in Magna Carta to limit royal authority

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • PLEASE HELP!!!!!!!!!!!
    6·2 answers
  • Many weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation were corrected with the adoption of the Constitution as the supreme law of the
    14·2 answers
  • The Wabash case, decided by the Supreme Court in 1886, led to the
    9·1 answer
  • how did Frederick Douglass change throughout his narrative? Give at least 2 examples on how he changed
    12·1 answer
  • Luke was the only gospel writer to include the parable of the Pharisee and the Publican praying. True False
    5·1 answer
  • Confucian ideals were primarily spread through Japan by way of...
    9·1 answer
  • What might be the advantages of dividing congress into two houses as described above? What might be the disadvantages?
    11·1 answer
  • Hey dose anyone know the answer to this?
    12·1 answer
  • Help me please! Thanks! Ill give brainliest!
    10·2 answers
  • Que condiciones son necesarias para hablar de una filosofía propia en Latinoamérica​
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!