Answer:
Option: They were tired of Britain's interference in trade and the impressment of American sailors.
Explanation:
Farmers and frontier settlers demand war against Britain because of the laws and regulation that implemented on them. The navigation acts controlled the trading rights of the colonies. The acts made settlers annoyed because they reduced the economic opportunities for the colonies. These acts eventually served in bringing the Revolutionary War in America.
Question: the major difference between an explanatory thesis and an argumentative thesis is that: Th major difference between an explanatory thesis and an argumentative thesis is that:
Answer: <u>Argumentative essays, as the name implies, is an essay in which you argue for something. Questions are often based on a selected issue like: “Is science important in our lives”, to which you will have a thesis and anti-thesis statement, supported with facts and reasoning. Most academic essays are in this format as well. Expository on the other hand is more like creative writing. As the name implies, you are trying to expose or express something. This can be a short narrative story to a question like
: “What was your best birthday ever?” or a mock letter to the question of
: “You bought something online and noticed that the product was damaged. Write a letter to the manager to seek for an exchange or refund.”</u>
<em>Hope this helps!</em>
<em>~~~~~~~~~~~~~</em>
<em>~A.W~ZoomZoom44</em>
Yes I think that each side has good things to say about the other side. This is because I think that many people's political viewpoints don't always perfectly align to one party or the other. In reality, life is much more complicated than picking one side. Sure some people might agree with policies from the Democrat's side, but they might see other Republican views to be valid as well. I like to think of it as a buffet of ideas, where people tend to pick and choose which talking points they magnetically snap to. We could have for example a socially liberal person but who supports conservative financial measures; or we could have someone who has very religious conservative morals, but supports liberal monetary policies.
In other words, it's unrealistic to assume people will be purely one party. Those who seem that way tend to be stuck in a bubble where it's like a feedback loop of talking points fed to them. Fox News is one example of this on the conservative side, while MSNBC is an example of this on the liberal side. Those stuck in this bubble would likely not have much nice things to say about the other side, if they have anything nice to say at all. However, I think to some (if not many) people, politics has become very toxic that they simply turn the tv off entirely. By "turn off", I mean literally turn it off or change the channel to something else. These people I'd consider somewhere in the middle in a moderate range. Furthermore, these moderates are likely to have some nice things to say about both sides, but they might have their complaints about both sides as well.
In short, if you pick someone from either extreme, then it's likely they'll have nothing nice to say about the other side. If you pick someone from the middle, then they might have nice things to say about both sides. It all depends who you ask. Also, it depends on how politically active they are.
