1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
riadik2000 [5.3K]
3 years ago
15

Describe the perspectives of the “Conscience Whigs”, transcendentalist, and southern expansionists over the Mexican War.

History
1 answer:
icang [17]3 years ago
5 0

The Mexican-American War, which took place between 1846 and 1848, during the presidency of James Knox Polk, happened because Mexico refused to accept Texas´ petition to be accepted as independent from the country and they also refused to give up their claim over California and New Mexico. When this happened, the U.S deployed Zachary Taylor and men to the Rio Grande, which was then expected by the U.S to be accepted by Mexico as the new border between them and also sent representatives to Mexico City to negotiate. However the Mexican government refused and attacked American forces. This led to a great confrontation and the loss of these states and almost Mexico City itself. Many people opposed this war on several grounds; two such groups were the Conscience Whigs and also the Transcendentalists. However, there were also people in favor of this conflict; one such group were the southern expansionists.

First of all, the Conscience Whigs, a group of northern Americans who broke away from the main Whigs party because they opposed slavery, argued against the Mexican-American War because they believed that this conflict would only serve to expand slavery into the newly acquired territory. This would also upset the existing fragile balance between the free and slave states and they did not want that either.

The Trascendentalists, a group born in New England from Ralph Waldo Emerson, and who followed the ideals set by trascendentalism of a person´s capacity to self-govern and self-direct and the rejection to the rule by the majority, rejected the Mexican-American War on the grounds that they believed the U.S government should not try to impose its system and beliefs on others, especially the Mexicans.

Finally, there were also those who thought the war was correct and should happen. These were the southern expansionists. Their reasons were first, that in this way they would be able to acquire more land and thus expand and gain better lands and resources and second, they would be able to ascertain that European powers like Britain, would be kept away from their borders and would not seek to attack them because of their power.

You might be interested in
Which statement about the executive role of the president of the United States is true?
AveGali [126]

Answer:

The President is both the head of state and head of government of the United States of America, and Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces. Under Article II of the Constitution, the President is responsible for the execution and enforcement of the laws created by Congress.

Explanation:

4 0
4 years ago
What is the effect of the supermacy clause in the constitution
svlad2 [7]

Answer:

The Constitution's Supremacy Clause prohibits state governments from passing laws that conflict with federal laws and also prohibits any entity from enforcing laws that conflict with the Constitution. This protects enumerated powers, which are federal government powers that are specifically set out in the Constitution.

3 0
2 years ago
Advantages and disadvantages free market economy
Triss [41]
Well in a free market economy the product is chosen by the people that consume it so that would be a advantage, but as the consumers are the ones choosing the products they might not be choosing healthy products. 
7 0
3 years ago
How did Gandhi demonstrate perseverance, a characteristic of a hero?
Crank
<span>C. He allowed each person the opportunity to discover his or her own truth.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Select the best answer for the question.
Kazeer [188]

Answer: Burglary is an example of crime against habitation.

Explanation: Burglary, also called breaking and entering and sometimes housebreaking, is illegally entering a building or other areas to do something illegal there. Usually, that offense is theft, but most jurisdictions include others within the ambit of burglary.

7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of these statements regarding feudalism is most accurate?
    11·1 answer
  • According to pope urban ii, what will happen to Christians who go on a crusade?
    12·2 answers
  • How did spain emerge as the first modern european power?
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following describes part of the Constitution of 1777
    13·2 answers
  • Which of these LEAST characterizes postwar Florida? A) diverse economy B) steady population growth C) up-to-date transportation
    10·1 answer
  • What was part of the agenda of southern Democrats?
    7·2 answers
  • What effects did destalinization have on Soviet satellite countries?
    6·1 answer
  • How is electromagnetic energy from the microwave transformed into heat energy?
    14·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELPPP ASAP 30 POINTS
    15·1 answer
  • What were the coastal tribes known for?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!