1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
rjkz [21]
3 years ago
6

Identify how many rulers Rome had between A.D.180 and A.D.284.

History
2 answers:
german3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Rome had 29 different rulers

Explanation:

Rome had about 29 different rulers also known as emperors from A.D.180 to A.D 284 and some of these rulers were strong( Constantine ) while some were weak rulers the strong rulers were the ones who led the Roman armies to battles while the weak ones bribed the Army to support and fight for him.

some of the rulers that ruled Rome within these times that were selected on merit were: Trajan, Hadrian, Antoninus Pius and Marcus Aurelius. these were some of the great rulers of Rome

Yakvenalex [24]3 years ago
3 0
There were 14 different rulers in Rome during that time period.

Hope this helps!!
You might be interested in
Explain ONE way in which Chinese society influenced<br> Japan in the Tokugawa era.
sertanlavr [38]

Answer:

China exterted considerable cultural influence on Japan for many centuries. Writing, Buddhism (through Korea) and Confucianism are all cultural loans made by Japan. Tokugawa society was a socially hierchical society with a clear place for individulas in it. Respecting social hierarchy is a major Confucian idea.

Explanation:

4 0
4 years ago
Do you believe the city of salem should be capitalizing on the make- believe aspect of witchcraft?
borishaifa [10]

Answer:

But Salem Town opted to capitalize on the trials in an attempt to draw tourists to the area and began promoting itself as Witch City in earnest in the 1960s. Some visitors to Salem over Halloween weekend were perturbed to discover that they weren't vacationing in witch trial central.

Explanation:

pls mark brainliest

8 0
3 years ago
Write a three paragraph editorial about wilsons war message
weeeeeb [17]

Answer:Explanation: On the 3d of February last I officially laid before you the extraordinary announcement of the Imperial German Government that on and after the 1st day of February it was its purpose to put aside all restraints of law or of humanity and use its submarines to sink every vessel that sought to approach either the ports of Great Britain and Ireland or the western coasts of Europe or any of the ports controlled by the enemies of Germany within the Mediterranean. That had seemed to be the object of the German submarine warfare earlier in the war, but since April of last year the Imperial Government had somewhat restrained the commanders of its undersea craft in conformity with its promise then given to us that passenger boats should not be sunk and that due warning would be given to all other vessels which its submarines might seek to destroy, when no resistance was offered or escape attempted, and care taken that their crews were given at least a fair chance to save their lives in their open boats. The precautions taken were meagre and haphazard enough, as was proved in distressing instance after instance in the progress of the cruel and unmanly business, but a certain degree of restraint was observed The new policy has swept every restriction aside. Vessels of every kind, whatever their flag, their character, their cargo, their destination, their errand, have been ruthlessly sent to the bottom without warning and without thought of help or mercy for those on board, the vessels of friendly neutrals along with those of belligerents. Even hospital ships and ships carrying relief to the sorely bereaved and stricken people of Belgium, though the latter were provided with safe-conduct through the proscribed areas by the German Government itself and were distinguished by unmistakable marks of identity, have been sunk with the same reckless lack of compassion or of principle.

I was for a little while unable to believe that such things would in fact be done by any government that had hitherto subscribed to the humane practices of civilized nations. International law had its origin in the at tempt to set up some law which would be respected and observed upon the seas, where no nation had right of dominion and where lay the free highways of the world. By painful stage after stage has that law been built up, with meagre enough results, indeed, after all was accomplished that could be accomplished, but always with a clear view, at least, of what the heart and conscience of mankind demanded. This minimum of right the German Government has swept aside under the plea of retaliation and necessity and because it had no weapons which it could use at sea except these which it is impossible to employ as it is employing them without throwing to the winds all scruples of humanity or of respect for the understandings that were supposed to underlie the intercourse of the world. I am not now thinking of the loss of property involved, immense and serious as that is, but only of the wanton and wholesale destruction of the lives of noncombatants, men, women, and children, engaged in pursuits which have always, even in the darkest periods of modern history, been deemed innocent and legitimate. Property can be paid for; the lives of peaceful and innocent people can not be. The present German submarine warfare against commerce is a warfare against mankind.

It is a war against all nations. American ships have been sunk, American lives taken, in ways which it has stirred us very deeply to learn of, but the ships and people of other neutral and friendly nations have been sunk and overwhelmed in the waters in the same way. There has been no discrimination. The challenge is to all mankind. Each nation must decide for itself how it will meet it. The choice we make for ourselves must be made with a moderation of counsel and a temperateness of judgment befitting our character and our motives as a nation. We must put excited feeling away. Our motive will not be revenge or the victorious assertion of the physical might of the nation, but only the vindication of right, of human right, of which we are only a single champion.

Explanation:

finelly im finish :)

7 0
4 years ago
Which statement best describes why Progressives worked to reform the meat-packing industry in the early 1900s?
polet [3.4K]

Answer:

I believe its c the induatry used unsafe manufacturing practices. i hope this helps.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Women were primarily responsible for herding the livestock
Kitty [74]
They were primarily responsible for cooking or cleaning the village aswell as looking after the husbands young
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Name three situation in which focuses is created
    6·1 answer
  • Speaker 1: Thank goodness the mayor has the most power in our city — she really knows what she's doing. Speaker 2: It's great to
    9·2 answers
  • Which of the following cold war incidents occurred during the eisenhower years? coup d'��tat in iran suez canal crisis vietnam w
    11·1 answer
  • What can the British gain from winning the war of 1812?
    10·1 answer
  • The Battle of New Orleans established a great wave of nationalism in America, even though it occurred after a peace treaty was s
    5·1 answer
  • Based on the "Inflation as Measured by the Consumer Price Index" graph, what conclusion can be drawn about the period from 1960
    7·1 answer
  • What is a democratic republic?
    13·2 answers
  • Match each viewpoint about the legal status of the South to President Abraham Lincoln or to Congress.
    15·2 answers
  • Which of the following is NOT an accomplishment of Justinian? O Justinian Code O Building the Hagia Sophia Renaming Constantinop
    6·1 answer
  • Who were the first immigrants that came to Argentina?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!