Answer:
The questions above were posed on a debating website and some of the results are shown below. You task is to write your own response
to the questions above. You should aim to write at least 110 words saying why you think the ToV was fair or unfair to Germany. You should
also say what Allied leaders did you most agree with and what provision (clause) did you think was the most fair or unfair. Use the
students answers to help you decide what information you should put in your own answer but make sure you give reasons for your
responses using your work from class and research you do at home.
Explanation:
im so sorry if it didint help
The naming of a Jewish child is a most profound spiritual moment. The Sages say that naming a baby is a statement of her character, her specialness, and her path in life. For at the beginning of life we give a name, and at the end of life a "good name" is all we take with us. (see Talmud – Brachot 7b; Arizal – Sha'ar HaGilgulim 24b)
Further, the Talmud tells us that parents receive one-sixtieth of prophecy when picking a name. An angel comes to the parents and whispers the Jewish name that the new baby will embody.
Yet this still doesn't seem to help parents from agonizing over which name to pick!
So how do we choose a name? And why is the father's name traditionally not given to a son – e.g. Jacob Cohen Jr., Isaac Levy III? Can a boy be named after a female relative? Can the name be announced before the Bris?
Jewish Customs
Naming a Jewish baby is not only a statement of what we hope she will be, but also where she comes from.
Ashkenazi Jews have the custom of naming a child after a relative who has passed away. This keeps the name and memory alive, and in a metaphysical way forms a bond between the soul of the baby and the deceased relative. This is a great honor to the deceased, because its soul can achieve an elevation based on the good deeds of the namesake. The child, meanwhile, can be inspired by the good qualities of the deceased – and make a deep connection to the past. (Noam Elimelech - Bamidbar) from http://www.aish.com/jl/l/b/48961326.html
Jack is likely to be a sensation seeker. This is because Jack is constantly in need of attention a sensation or a specific feeling for the sake of achieving that feeling. He has a high level of arousal and enjoys potentially life-threatening hobbies such as skydiving, bungee jumping from bridges and swimming with sharks.
Answer:
D. Nothing
Explanation:
Angela is not guilty here. Te question tells us that she had no knowledge of her friends intentions. Her friend had the intention of robbing a store and even though angela drove the car, she did not know that a gun was concealed somewhere. If she had knowledge of these before hand, she would have been guilty of aiding and abetting a crime. But since she didn't, she is not guilty.
Answer:
All of these provide clues to some degree which can help in determining the meaning of a sentence.
Explanation:
A. Listening to other speakers gives clues about the tone of the discussion. The tone is very important in determining the contextual meaning of a sentence.
B. The social setting can give us clues about the tenor of what is being discussed. This tenor will essentially define the context of the sentence, or what is being said as a whole.
C. The audience's expectation dictates how information is being imparted, which would indicate what meaning certain terms or phrases might have in the specific context of what the audience is expecting to hear.
D. This will provide the lowest clues. Even though personal goals do have the ability of dictate the context, it is much more influenced by the three other factors listed above. Whatever the personal goals of the speaker are, for them to effectively impart their message, they have to take into account the other three factors.
