The right answer is A. by sending unarmed supply ships to the fort.
In his inaugural speech, Abraham Lincoln was explicitly defending that secession was unconstitutional but was not willing to invade the South. But in this attempt to resupply the Fort Sumter in the south resulted at the beginning of the war. When South Carolinians shucked Fort Sumter, in Charleston Harbor, Lincoln began his call to arms. Other southern states seceded at that point, and the Civil War was initiated.
I would say Capital Goods and Government Companies! Forgive me if I am wrong.
Answer: GERMANY
<u>Explanation</u>:
The Zimmerman telegram was a note sent by Germany's foreign minister to the ambassador of Mexico, seeking alliance with Mexico against the United States if the US entered the war. Learning of the telegram increased concerns by the US about Germany's intentions, and led to declaration of war.
Further detail:
The reasons that led to the US declaring war against Germany in 1917:
- In January, 1917, Germany had resumed its policy of unrestricted submarine warfare. Germany had halted its attacks on non-military vessels (which it suspected of carrying military supplies) after the furor over the sinking of the Lusitania in 1915. But now Germany was resuming attacks by its U-boats.
- In February, 1917, the "Zimmerman Telegram" was intercepted by British intelligence and shared with the US. Germany's foreign minister, Arthur Zimmerman, had telegraphed an offer to Mexico's ambassador seeking Mexico's support in war vs. the United States in exchange for getting land back from the US.
- On April 2, 1917, President Woodrow Wilson made a powerful speech to Congress in which he argued that the nation needed to enter the war "to make the world safe for democracy." Wilson's speech was powerfully convincing, and four days later, Congress declared war.
Answer:
We will notice that even though they were written within a period of just over a decade and mostly by the same people, the differences are quite clear between them.
Explanation:
If we compare the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution of the U.S we would get a fair idea of the differences between them. The Articles were heavily criticized for centralizing all the powers in the hands of state governments and leaving the central government at their disposal. But this wasn't the only distinguishing point between these documents. The two distinguished in several ways such as the judiciary, power of levying taxes, the number of votes in Congress, etc.
the sale is slaves across state line was outlawed
