1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Aleks04 [339]
3 years ago
8

What is a significance of the Supreme Court decision Humphrey's Executor vs. United States?

History
2 answers:
Dafna1 [17]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: The outcome: The Supreme Court ruled unanimously that the President could not remove a Federal Trade Commissioner for a cause other than "inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office." In brief: President Franklin D. Roosevelt asked William E. Humphrey, a member of the Federal Trade Commission, to resign.

Explanation:

lianna [129]3 years ago
8 0
!!The outcome: The Supreme Court ruled unanimously that the President could not remove a Federal Trade Commissioner for a cause other than "inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office." In brief: President Franklin D. Roosevelt asked William E. Humphrey, a member of the Federal Trade Commission, to resign.


Hopes it helps you !!
You might be interested in
What was the 5 main reasons loyalists wanted to remain loyal to the crown of Britain.
stepan [7]

Answer:

People were dying times were hard. One reason was because some people wanted peace, they didnt want violence. They protested and the were purist.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
THIS SI THE ANSWER TO UR QUESTION 11111
castortr0y [4]
Answer is 3. monique should only use the first sample
6 0
3 years ago
The destruction of the native population of the Americas and the need for plantation labor resulted in
larisa [96]
Seeking Slaves from africa
4 0
3 years ago
Which two women were associated with the National Woman’s Suffrage Association?
Alina [70]

Answer:

Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Susan B. Anthony

Explanation:

Formed in 1890, NAWSA was the result of a merger between two rival factions--the National Woman Suffrage Association (NWSA) led by Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Susan B. Anthony, and the American Woman Suffrage Association (AWSA). These opposing groups were organized in the late 1860s, partly as the result of a disagreement over strategy. NWSA favored women's enfranchisement through a federal constitutional amendment, while AWSA believed success could be more easily achieved through state-by-state campaigns. NAWSA combined both of these techniques, securing the passage of the Nineteenth Amendment in 1920 through a series of well-orchestrated state campaigns under the dynamic direction of Carrie Chapman Catt. With NAWSA's primary goal of women's enfranchisement now a reality, the organization was transformed into the League of Women Voters.

6 0
2 years ago
In the source written by Lopez de Gemara on the Mexican rebellion, what were the attitudes of the Spaniards toward the Mexican?
PolarNik [594]

The attitudes of the Spaniards toward the Aztec rebellion, according to the criteria of Lopez de Gómara were of consternation, and disdain, as he opposed the Mexican rebellion.

<h3>Why Spaniards had these sentiments against Aztecs?</h3>

In his text, Gómara referred to the Indians in Tenochtitlán as a "beast" just because they were very different from the Spaniards.

Native Indians did not wear the clothes Spaniards wore. Indians did not have horses for daily chores.

Gómora said that Aztecs were ignorant people. They had no education and did not have currency, so necessary for economic transactions.

He also said Indians were sinners because they did not believe in the one and only god. Indians worshiped many gods.

He was comparing a different society with the European society of the time. It means that Indians lived a totally different life in contact with and respect for mother nature. Something the Spaniards and Europeans would never understand in North America or South America.

We conclude that López de Gómara opposed the Mexican rebellion and described the Indians with consternation and disdain. Europeans never tried to understand the circumstances of the Native Indians.

Learn more about the Aztec rebellion here:

brainly.com/question/15221853

#SPJ1

4 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • What did raegan believe the government should do to improve the economy
    12·1 answer
  • Q.8
    12·2 answers
  • Which reasons did you include in your answer? Many people moved from rural areas to cities in search of jobs. Immigrants came to
    6·2 answers
  • Why do you think Christian persecution rose as the Pax Romana crumbled?
    7·1 answer
  • The right to petition members of the government is contained in the ___ amendment to the constitution
    12·2 answers
  • Why Egyptians are considered one of the most complex and important civilizations in ancient history
    15·1 answer
  • In 322 BC, Chandragupta Maurya founded the Mauryan dynasty. The central government formed by Chandragupta Maurya provided a stab
    7·1 answer
  • What was the over purpose/goal of the Indian Removal Act of 1830?​
    8·2 answers
  • Which statement regarding helots is TRUE?
    7·1 answer
  • How does the united states governemnt have an impact on the land within it's borders?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!