Answer:
Market economies utilize private ownership as the means of production and voluntary exchanges/contracts. In a command economy, government owns land, capital, and resources.
Explanation:
I just know this
The name of the king of the Hittites as described in the Preamble is Suppiluliumas I.
<h3>Which was the Hittites King name?</h3>
Suppiluliumas I, can be decribed as one which is been known to the Hittite king around c. 1380 and was able to dominate the history of the ancient Middle East.
It should be noted that hew dominated for the greater part of four decades a as regards the Hittite kingdom to Imperial power.
Learn more about Hittites at:
brainly.com/question/16717125
#SPJ1
Well, the moment the US intervened with the affairs of the World was the moment that the US could not go back to an isolationist policy. The US simply cannot afford to stop playing a role in world affairs, due to the fact that the US is a capitalist society and that the US has a lot of exports/imports. Unless the US can reach a level of capacity where it is self sufficient, which is currently impossible to do, the US must participate in the affairs of the World in order to survive.
The simple answer to your complex question is NO. This is assuming that you live in a country where there are good laws (remember that history is full of bad governments that implemented bad laws) and that law enforcement is effective. Simplisticly, you should only ask yourself this question when your or your families life is being threatened and law enforcement is not around. Your response must still be within the constraints of your laws or you will find yourself in hot water. I'm not even going to try to discuss the ethics and morals that can apply as the situation can vary immensely. Keep it simple - don't operate outside the law, rather fight against unjust laws.
Answer:
the British would kidnap American sailors to join their navy, causing the americans to be extremely mad
