Answer:
The novel centers on Mary Lennox, who is living in India with her wealthy British family. She is a selfish and disagreeable 10-year-old girl who has been spoiled by her servants and neglected by her unloving parents. When a cholera epidemic kills her parents and the servants, Mary is orphaned.
Explanation:
The Secret Garden is a charming book about a girl named Mary Lennox. She is a spoiled and lucky child who lives in India. When her parents die due to a cholera epidemic, she moves to Misselthwaite Manor to live with her rich uncle in England. Mary begins to explore the grounds and takes an interest in the outdoors. As Mary forms new friendships, she continues to learn the magic of her surroundings.
hope this helps...
have a great weekend! (￣▽￣)ノ
Answer:
i know it
Explanation:
Worldwide unemployment and poverty have grown enormously since the UN launched the World Day for Social Justice in 2007, and governments have failed to fix the problem. Powerful financial and business elites are stilldictating policy and ordinary people continue to bear the burden. Even in the Middle-East and North Africa, where millions have risen against dictatorship and repression, anti-democratic forces are gaining ground and preparing to turn the clock back,” said ITUC General Secretary Sharan Burrow.
pls mark brainliest
The correct answer is A. Gives the idea that the writer is sympathetic and respectable.
Explanation:
The purpose of using an ethical appeal in a text or speech is to persuade the audience by showing the author is credible. In this context, it is common the writer uses strategies to shows he/she is respectable and due to this, the audience should believe the ideas proposed in the text. For example, the writer might mention his/her experience and knowledge on the topic of the text. Moreover, in this appeal, the author might show he is sympathetic or ethically correct. According to this, the correct answer is A.
Visualize success, Concentrate on the message.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
A new post-conflict chapter characterized not by bigotry but by national unity is being written in South Africa. Playing a key role in the rewriting, representation, and remembering of the past is the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission which, in 1996, started the process of officially documenting human rights violations during the years 1960-1993. This nation-building discourse of reconciliation, endorsed by both the present government and South Africa's ruling party, the African National Congress (ANC), has been a crucial agent of a new collective memory after the trauma of apartheid. But the confession of apartheid crimes proved beneficial mostly for perpetrators in search of amnesty rather than a genuine interest in a rehabilitated society. Thus, the amnesty system did very little to advance reconciliation. It is for these reasons that the South African TRC was cynically regarded by its critics as a fiasco, a "Kleenex commission" that turned human suffering into theatrical spectacle watched all over the world. There is, in fact, little that is "new" or "post" in a country that retains apartheid features of inequity. What is often overlooked in this prematurely celebratory language of reconciliation is South Africa's interregnum moment. Caught between two worlds, South Africans are confronted with Antonio Gramsci's conundrum that can be specifically applied to the people of this region: an old order that is dying and not yet dead and a new order that has been conceived but not yet born. And in this interregnum, Gramsci argues, "a great variety of morbid symptoms appear" (276). Terms like "new South Africa" and "rainbow nation," popularized by former president F.W. de Klerk and Desmond Tutu, the former chairperson of the TRC respectively, then, not only ignore the "morbid" aspects of South Africa's bloody road to democracy, but also inaccurately suggest a break with the past. This supposed historical rupture belies the continuities of apartheid.
scorn her.
