Is this a question or an answer to a question
The way to achieve this impartiality – to free judges to decide cases based on what the law actually requires, and on nothing else – is to ensure that the judiciary is independent, or, put differently, not subject to reprisals for decisions on the bench.
But judicial independence is not an absolute or singular value defining our courts. The principle of judicial restraint is equally important – and it is inextricably linked to judicial independence. At one level, the tension between the two seems inescapable. But there is an important sense in which an independent judiciary and judicial restraint are flip sides of the same coin. Both aim to minimize the influence of extraneous factors on judicial decision-making. A judge must not decide a case with an eye toward public approbation, because whether a particular result is popular is irrelevant to whether it is legally sound. In the same way, a judge must not consult
They were fearful of the power of the British government. They did not want someone to gain too much power over them once again.
The demand curve for bell-bottoms __shifted to the right__ its the simple answer, but besides that, it can be said that the demand for these pants, which had been used by the navy for a long time, quickly became fashionable among hippies, first used by women and then by men, until singers and artists began to use the bell bottoms and their popularity grew so much that they have become a symbol of disco nights in the 70s.
Women in the sixteenth, seventeenth, and eighteenth centuries were challenged with expressing themselves in a patriarchal system that generally refused to grant merit to women's views.
