I agree that it would also be D, because the other answers would be just ways to see a scenario and make it best fit for you, whereas D points out what most extremists do.
Answer:
The main advantages of the USA were:
A larger population, the USA had the majority of large cities of North America at the time, and a lot of immigrants, while the Confederacy was mainly rural, and not as populated. This larger population meant a more numerous army.
And a more powerful economy with some industry, which facilitated the production of arms and supplies for the military.
The disadvantage was that USA was the aggressor, and had to take up territory, while the confederacy only had to defend itself.
The confederacy main advantage was that as defenders, they knew most of the territory better, and had overall a more advantageous geographical position, at least at the start of the war. The main disadvantage for the Confederacy was precisely the smaller population -which means a smaller army- and the less developed economy, which was mainly agrarian, lacking almost any form of industry.
Answer:
They are sometimes factual
Explanation:
The truism about details of setting and plot in historical fiction is that they are factual sometimes.
A historical fiction is a type of writing where the story line happens in the past. One major characteristic is that it is sometimes factual and other times is inaccurate.
C. The constitution does not protect people’s rights
