1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Marizza181 [45]
3 years ago
13

One historian wrote,"one long-range of schemes that appear almost accidental when viewed singly." Does this practice of imperial

ism in Africa and Asia substantiate this statement?
History
2 answers:
aleksley [76]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

This statement alludes to the history of colonial expansion in African and Asian countries. This period was marked with the significant events in the 19th century where there was a need to expand the European territories in other countries beyond Europe. For example, China was divided into 20 spheres of influence. In the same way, Africa was divided into the same 20 spheres of influence with Britain taking the most from Africa.

Therefore, correctly spoken, the author and historian is correct in saying the statement.

kap26 [50]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

To a point let me say that the practice of imperialism in Asia and Africa substantiates this statement because the Europeans did not know vividly what awaits them upon arrival, just that it was different than their everyday experience.

They couldn’t have fully expected what they would find which would make the success of their colonies an absolute accident, hence the practice of imperialism seems to substantiate the statement.

You might be interested in
What doctrine was developed by George Kennan as it pertained to the spread of
Darina [25.2K]

Answer:

Containment

Explanation:

hope this helps :)

5 0
3 years ago
I need help! ASAP!!
elena-14-01-66 [18.8K]

Answer:

B. Banks failed because of their lack of cash reserves.

Explanation:

I remember learning this a few years ago in middle school. Hope this helps! :P

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
5. What would the persons bringing the<br> case ask for?
xxTIMURxx [149]

Answer: Monetary Compensation

Explanation:

This question relates to the shipwrecked sailors Dudley and Stevens who killed and ate a fellow sailor named Brooks in order to survive the ordeal. A criminal case was brought by the state in <em>The Queen vs Dudley and Stephens</em> wherein they were sentenced to death but subsequently released after about 6 months.

If a Civil case had been brought against them, the Plaintiffs would be asking for monetary relief or compensation because in Civil Court the punishment is either monetary compensation or an order to the defendant to fulfil their obligation in the contract in dispute.

As Brooks was already dead, the only logical relief the plaintiffs could receive would be monetary compensation not unlike what OJ Simpson was ordered to pay the family of Ron Goldman when he was found liable for Goldman's murder in civil court.

8 0
3 years ago
What was one reason why Lincoln pushed for passage of the Thirteenth Amendment?
Solnce55 [7]

The correct answer is:

A. Lincoln declared it was the South's punishment for starting the Civil War.

Explanation:

<em>The 13th Amendment of the American Constitution abolished slavery and involuntary servitude</em>; it was ratified in 1865 after the Civil War and states:

  • “Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.”

President Lincoln stated in two speeches that Southern states had caused the Civil War because<u> </u><u>they favored slavery and because of their secession from the Union</u>, his first attempt to abolish slavery was the <em>Emancipation Proclamation in 1863,</em> but it only freed slaves from the<u> Confederate States of America,</u> so<em> Lincoln pressured the Congress to pass the Thirteenth Amendment before Southern states were restored as part of the Union </em>so they couldn't vote against the amendment. President Lincoln did not lived to see the final ratification on December 6,1865 because he was assassinated months before.




4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
And more here u go babe.
stepladder [879]

Answer:

Thanks i guess

4 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • A ___controls who or what goes into or out of a place.
    8·1 answer
  • How were hieroglyphics used in ancient egypt?
    10·1 answer
  • The right of the national government to impose a military draft is this specific power. a. expressed c. reserved b. implied d. c
    11·2 answers
  • What lies between the Blackland Prairie and the Edwards Plateau.
    12·1 answer
  • What is one difference between each of the following pairs of military leaders' contributions to the allied victory in world war
    5·1 answer
  • How would being more friendly with China and Soviet Union help the us end the war in Vietnam ?
    6·1 answer
  • Why did reconstruction end and what did that mean for Black people in the United States?
    15·1 answer
  • What does the geologic time scale measure?
    15·1 answer
  • What did the Great Map cover? Why was it important?
    11·2 answers
  • Why do some people see mail in voting as a threat
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!