How did the Middle Colonies differ from the Northern and Southern Colonies?

How did the Roman Empire react to attacks by invading tribes? It turned power over to the tribal leaders. It allowed the raids i

Andreas93 [3]

It maintained its borders and destroyed the threatening tribes.

4 0

3 years ago

In the late 1980s, what caused the rehnquist court to start to restrict congress's ability to regulate various areas of the econ

enyata [817]

changes in the composition of the Supreme Court.

This was largely due to efforts of President Reagan whose appointments of Justices to the Supreme Court made the Court largely conservative. This includes elevating William Rehnquist, to the position of Chief Justice in 1986 when Warren Burger retired

5 0

3 years ago

N the Iliad, when Achilles takes pity on Priam and allows him to take Hector's body back to Troy for an honorable burial, what d

7nadin3 [17]

D.He wanted to send diplomats to communist countries.

8 0

3 years ago

The generally accepted beginning of the protestant reformation was _____________________. group of answer choices

murzikaleks [220]

The generally accepted beginning of the protestant reformation was October 31st, 1517.

The Protestant Reformation was a movement within Western Christianity in the 16th century that sought to reform the Church and bring it back to its original principles. The main leaders of the Reformation were Martin Luther, John Calvin, and Ulrich Zwingli.

The Reformation had a significant impact on the course of Western history, resulting in the split of the Western Church into the Catholic and Protestant branches.

The Reformation was a reaction against the perceived abuses of the Catholic Church. The Reformation had a profound impact on European society, sparking centuries of religious and political conflict.

To know more about Protestant Reformation, click here.

brainly.com/question/13064058

#SPJ4

5 0

1 year ago

What do you see as the pros (good things) and cons (bad things) of the Athenian democratic system? Why do you think the system w

Drupady [299]

Answer:

Pros:

1.Every male had the same right to speak in the assembly, to run for office or to get elected. Most officials got paid for their job so that poor people could also work in politics without going bankrupt.

2.The discussion of politics was very open to the public, as everything was discussed on the peoples assembly and almost all things were voted on.

3.It made abuse of power complicated, as you could always bring a charge against an official in the peoples assembly. Also, the so called Ostrakismos made it possible to ban corrupt politicians from Athens.

4.Every citizen was included in politics. Because they actively worked in politics, they realized its importance and how they could change their own live if they get active.

Cons:

There were no human rights, there was slavery, women had practically no rights, foreigners got discriminated against. The system was highly undemocratic because only a small share of the population was actually included in politics.

Only a few officials got elected. Most of them got into extremely important offices through random chance. Basically, somebody who couldn't even write was allowed to decide about the live of other citizens. That is not supposed to happen in modern democracy.

As there was no parliament elected for a longer period of time, politics were more unstable than in many western democracies.

The peoples assemblies were hard to organize. Only about a quarter of the citizens regularly attended them, whereas a real parliament allowed proportional representation of everyone all the time.

Even today, not everybody is an expert in every area of politics. So, if you still have the power to decide, you might very well mess it up, just because you don't know better. This also happened in Athens and isn't that likely in systems where elected representatives do politics professionally and are better informed.

Explanation:

7 0

2 years ago