The correct answers are restrictive, semi-restrictive, and permissive.
Restrictive societies are those where children do not have any sort of sexual expression and where information about sex is kept hidden from them; such societies would be Murngin, Trukese, Ashanti, etc. In these societies, sexuality is not often discussed, especially at this young age.
Semi-restrictive societies are those where there are certain 'rules' as to what level of sexuality children and adolescents can be informed about and can express themselves, however, these 'rules' aren't so strict as when it comes to restrictive societies. An example of such a society could be the Alorese.
Permissive societies are those where people are quite open about their sexuality and freely and openly discuss such matters with children and adolescents. They are quite liberal about this and about sexual education of the youth. Such societies could be Hopi, Samoans, Yapese, etc.
Answer:
<em>The correct option is d) someone with savant syndrome.</em>
Explanation:
Savant syndrome can be described as a condition in which a person who has mental disabilities is seen to be excellent or above average in certain other activities. Generally,people with savant syndrome have known to have excellent memory. For example, such people can be excellent in calculation or music abilities.
As the scenario in the question depicts, Alexandra is mentally handicapped but excellent in music abilities. Hence, she is having savant syndrome.
The answer is influence. Conformity and Obedience refer to
an order being done or ordered to be done, whereas obedience is the form of social
influence wherein an individual acts in response to another individual’s
request or order, in which the person takes form in a shape of an authority or
higher position than you, such as an individual’s parents. While Conformity
refer to the act being done through social pressure. An individual is being
pressured by a number of individuals or present factors that affects the decision
of an individual.
<span> </span>
Answer:
Research is practical and realistic because it is based on the scientific method, which demands that research should be start with an hypothesis, that should be falsifiable (meaning that it can be proven right or wrong), followed by a scientific study in which the hypothesis is tested.
If the hypothesis is proven to be true, it does not mean that is conclusions will hold true for eternity, they could be proven wrong by further studies.
For this reason, research is both practica, because it is based on a practical method: the scientific method, and realistic, because it has a limited scope, and limited, verifiable understanding of reality, and can be proven wrong with other studies.
