I believe your answer would either be B. Suburbs caused people to live with others of the same socioeconomic status or C. suburbs caused American cities to grow rapidly. For B., I think this answer would be correct because a suburban area is an outlying district/residential area of a city and people in the same class would likely live there, most probable to be of the lower class (see "neighborhood," if needed to be cleared up). For C., suburbs are outlying districts, or neighborhoods, in a city. With more suburban areas, American cities will grow rapidly, even if they're made up of the lower class. With low-class neighborhoods making up most of the city, they may excel and become equal with the rest in the city, or at least not so far under.
Mostly, I would have to go with answer choice B.
Answer:
Ultimately, the Compromise did not resolve the issue of slavery's expansion; ... From left to right: Henry Clay, John Calhoun, Daniel Webster, and William Seward. ... Popular sovereignty paved the way for unprecedented violence in the West ... Who do you think got the better deal in the Compromise of 1850, the North or the ...
Explanation:
Gage trusted that military power would scatter the challenges however start an uprising. The Stamp Act of 1765 was the principal inner assessment exacted straightforwardly on American pioneers by the British government. The demonstration, which forced an expense on all paper archives in the settlements, came when the British Empire was somewhere down under water from the Seven Years' War and looking to its North American states as an income source. Contending that exclusive their own delegate gatherings could impose them, the settlers demanded that the demonstration was unlawful, and they turned to swarm brutality to scare stamp authorities into leaving.
