1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Helen [10]
3 years ago
7

What was the main cause of the 2002 stock market crash

History
1 answer:
Nastasia [14]3 years ago
5 0
Accounting scandals
You might be interested in
"SECTION. 1. The right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote
oksian1 [2.3K]

Answer:

26th Amendment

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Who said, “Boys, you certainly have a claim on me.”?
lina2011 [118]

Roosevelt said that to the Rough Riders.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Before unionization, workers labored under very poor conditions for poor salaries without any benefits. True False
AfilCa [17]

Answer:

The given statement is True.

Explanation:

Unionization is a process in which employees make union for themselves which act as a bridge between the other employees and the management. Before unionization, the lower level employees or the workers were treated so poorly. They were not given their wages on time. They were not offered any benefits or incentives. They were forced to work in much poor conditions. But when the concept of unionization came, now almost every organization has employees union which takes care of the rights of the employees and has managed to get better working conditions for the labors as well. In some situations, unions have become so strong that the management feels helpless in front of them.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why do you think the Catholic Church had more influence in Southern Europe
Marizza181 [45]
It was more involved with Southern Europe then then the other churches. I'm learning this right now in world history.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In 1960 two thirds of the 69 people killed during peaceful anti apartheid march were shot in the back what does this suggest hap
Anuta_ua [19.1K]
Government targeted protesters 

If protesters were shot in the back, that suggests they were not shot in self-defense or in a confrontation but rather as they ran away or were being peaceful. 

This evidence could support that the protesters were massacred by the government through the police forces. Being shot in the back suggests it was peaceful and protesters were not fighting back when shot. 
4 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Whoever helps gets brainliest answer and 10 points :)
    13·2 answers
  • Difference between presidents and governors
    15·2 answers
  • In what way was the empire of Ghana different from the later empire of Mali
    14·1 answer
  • Can all opportunity costs be evaluated using a cost/benefit analysis? Use an example to explain your answer
    10·1 answer
  • The land-use patterns the von Thünen model identifies would MOST likely change if which of the following were introduced to a re
    13·1 answer
  • What is neutrality?​
    13·1 answer
  • Who was Oscar Schindler?
    11·2 answers
  • How would Britain look like today without an empire ?<br><br>Someone answer me plz
    6·2 answers
  • The Fundamental Orders of Connecticut The Mayflower Compact The Virginia House of Burgesses The Pennsylvania Charter of Privileg
    10·1 answer
  • How were the natives treated during the war
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!