1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Eva8 [605]
3 years ago
14

Based on what is known about Stalin from history, which statement from his speech is the best example of hypocrisy?

History
2 answers:
Scilla [17]3 years ago
8 0
Hello there.

<span>Based on what is known about Stalin from history, which statement from his speech is the best example of hypocrisy?

Answer:
</span><span>A. We must bear in mind that the enemy is crafty, unscrupulous, experienced in deception and the dissemination of false rumors.</span>
kakasveta [241]3 years ago
4 0
I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is option A. Based on what is known about Stalin from history, the statement that is an example of hypocrisy would be "<span>We must bear in mind that the enemy is crafty, unscrupulous, experienced in deception and the dissemination of false rumors."</span>
You might be interested in
According to the map, in 1850 which region of the country had areas of 90 or more inhabitants per square mile?
MrMuchimi

Answer:

C i think

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the purpose of the the national security act of 1947?
madam [21]
The National Security Act of 1947 was a major restructuring of the United States government's military and intelligence agencies following World War II. The majority of the provisions of the Act took effect on September 18, 1947, the day after the Senate confirmed James Forrestal as the first Secretary of Defense.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
John Locke thought that people were neither good nor bad innately. How did Hobbes’s views differ from those of Locke’s?
Vladimir [108]

Answer:  A) Hobbes thought  people were innately violent.

<u>Further explanation</u>:

Both English philosophers believed there is a "social contract" -- that governments are formed by the will of the people.  But their theories on why people want to live under governments were very different.

Thomas Hobbes published his political theory in <em>Leviathan </em> in 1651, following the chaos and destruction of the English Civil War.  He saw human beings as naturally suspicious of one another, in competition with each other, and violent toward one another as a result.  Forming a government meant giving up personal liberty, but gaining security against what would otherwise be a situation of every person at war with every other person.

John Locke published his <em>Two Treatises on Civil Government </em>in 1690, following the mostly peaceful transition of government power that was the Glorious Revolution in England.  Locke believed people are born as blank slates--with no preexisting knowledge or moral leanings.  Experience then guides them to the knowledge and the best form of life, and they choose to form governments to make life and society better.

In teaching the difference between Hobbes and Locke, I've often put it this way.  If society were playground basketball, Hobbes believed you must have a referee who sets and enforces rules, or else the players will eventually get into heated arguments and bloody fights with one another, because people get nasty in competition that way.   Locke believed you could have an enjoyable game of playground basketball without a referee, but a referee makes the game better because then any disputes that come up between players have a fair way of being resolved.    Of course, Hobbes and Locke never actually wrote about basketball -- a game not invented until 1891 in America by James Naismith.  But it's just an illustration I've used to try to show the difference of ideas between Hobbes and Locke.   :-)

7 0
3 years ago
A basic position in American foreign policy has been that America must defend its foreign interests related to trade and securit
antoniya [11.8K]

The correct answer is A. Isolationism.

Isolationism is a foreign policy strategy that asserts to not intervene in foreign affairs that do not imply a real threat to the country. This policy limits the participation of a particular state in the international arena in order to avoid unnecessary conflicts or undesirable political, economic, or cultural influences. Different countries have taken Isolationism as a main foreign policy throughout history, like China during the Ming dynasty in the 15th century and the US during the 19th century.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Diocletian divided the empire
Paul [167]
I'm pretty sure that he divided it into east and west, which doesn't make sense because that isn't one of the answers. But this was a part of my history class last year and i remember it being East and West, so I would just go with B) North and South because that's the closest
5 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was an effect on the sinking of the Lusitania?
    14·1 answer
  • Which europeans had the most positive trading relationship with the native americans?
    11·1 answer
  • Explain the steps that occur as a society becomes a civilization
    13·1 answer
  • Why did the minoans and mycenaeans depend on trade (1 point)
    14·2 answers
  • In the 19th century, the belief was that production creates its own demand. By the early 20thcentury, American companies began t
    10·1 answer
  • Which of these best describes the environment of the New England colonies?
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following accurately describes a difference in the long-term impact of Judaism and the Vedic religion?
    7·1 answer
  • Are unions as necessary today as they were in 1900? Why or why not?​
    11·2 answers
  • By 1853, what were the five boundaries of the United States?
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a characteristic of a free-market economy?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!