One text that is valuable for gaining context about a historical event but is unreliable as "evidence" is a historical novel.
Please mark Brainliset!
Although a totalitarian government is generally considered an unproductive and harmful idea, a totalitarian government would be considered more efficient at making decisions than a democratic one, because a democratic government makes decisions based on the people making the decisions through representation of all the different peoples. A totalitarian government, on the other hand, is a political system in which one person holds total control over the state. This would mean that the person would make all the decisions without needing anyone's consent and this would be more efficient, as decisions would be made quicker.
Hopefully this helps please give me a thanks if you got it right :)
Answer:
When South Carolina's legislature cancelled the Nullification ordinance.
Explanation:
The confrontation between the state of South Carolina and the Federal government over the south Carolina's attempt to declare the federal Tariffs of 1828 and 1832 <em>as null and void</em> is called Nullification crisis. It lasted from 1832 to 1833. It also threatened to secede from the union if the federal government tried to enforce the tariffs.
<em>U.S President Andrew Jackson</em> declared that the states didn't have the right to nullify the tariffs. After this Congress passed Force Bill in 1833 and authorised the federal government to collect the tariffs by using force. South Carolina's legislature cancelled the Nullification ordinance and It ended the nullification crisis.
Soon, the compromise tariff of 1833 was also passed, it gradually lowered the tariffs over the next 10 years.
I think it was the production of train routs. Atlanta was chosen to be a train lines terminus(like a modern day train station) and from there it just grew.
