1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
gulaghasi [49]
3 years ago
5

HELP PLEASE!!

History
2 answers:
xxTIMURxx [149]3 years ago
8 0
The answer is B. The Middle and New England colonies would vote towards the Constitution, if the (so called) Founding Fathers would add a bill of rights. This was promised and the constitution was ratified in 1787. BUt they didnt add the Bill of Rights until 1891
Vlad [161]3 years ago
8 0

The answer is B. Enough states ratify the Constitution for it to go into effect -Apex

You might be interested in
Is it possible that America may have allowed a totalitarian government if the
Mars2501 [29]

Answer:Yes

Explanation:Because in the eyes of the politicians a country that runs is better than no country at all. And politicians were already currupt back then as well.

4 0
3 years ago
The Roman Republic ended when _____ came to power
Keith_Richards [23]
The Roman Republic ended when Caesar Augustus came to power.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How would you describe a federal system of government
DerKrebs [107]
<span>nation that is made up of many different regions, they can each have their own sets of laws.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How was the Lend-Lease program a significant departure from the policy of neutrality? It gave American convoys permission to att
Soloha48 [4]

Answer: The program involved the United States in the war by sending munitions and armaments.

The Lend-Lease policy was an American program that was designed to help the Allies win the war. It consisted of sending food, oil and military material to the United Kingdom, China, the Soviet Union, France and other Allied countries between 1941 and 1945. The program represented a departure from the policy of neutrality and non-interventionism that had dominated American politics since 1931.

8 0
3 years ago
Main arguments for imperialism
Mumz [18]

Answer: Development as an excuse for imperialism.

Explanation:

Proponents of imperialism sought to justify their imperialist aspirations. Developed and powerful countries have always carried out imperialism over those who have not reached that development stage. Imperialism has always aimed to enrich itself at the expense of others. Yet to defend their aspirations, the imperialists have always pointed out that their main aim is to contribute to these underdeveloped countries' development. The construction of the infrastructure was a cover for that. Still, the real goal of constructing the infrastructure was to make it easier to transport exploited raw materials from third countries.

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of these problems did the Union face on the home front?
    12·2 answers
  • The historic 1840 agreement between the maori and europeans in new zealand is known as the treaty of
    8·1 answer
  • Deforestation arvolves the widespread clearing of
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following events was not a part of the War of 1812?
    8·1 answer
  • The signers of the peace treaty supported the creation of the League of Nations. What happened that prevented the United States
    14·2 answers
  • What part of the Constitution starts with the words "We the People"?
    5·2 answers
  • In what ways were the spanish and portuguese empires similar in what ways were they different
    8·1 answer
  • 10. List two reasons that early pioneers settled by rivers:
    13·1 answer
  • What is the role of the country in teaching the principles of global citizenship?
    12·1 answer
  • What is the meaning of judicial power?.
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!