Answer:
haha thanks for the points btw the answer is. h2t=th6
Step-by-step explanation:
Here ya go. I hope this helps! :) (It was much easier to do this than to try and type it out, in my opinion)
The correct answer is: Proust Was a Neuroscientist<span> by Jonah Lehrer
Science ordinarily applies a reductionist approach. To structure a testable theory that could Additionally make faultlessly retested, simulated constructs would made. This is carried will permit clean analyses Also information about statistically huge correctness. However, the test will be we should constantly make what we’ve discovered et cetera check whether it fits Previously, with the bigger picture of how things worth of effort. Our particular social order regularly imitates this reductionist approach Concerning illustration it may be progressively disjointed, with accentuation on the need will practice. As a rule A large portion researchers don't completely appreciate, understand, alternately worth the human experience Also practically specialists don't completely appreciate, understand, alternately quality those rigors of the experimental technique. [I will concede on this continuum, i might fit additional under the experimental outlook battling on like craftsmanship. ] what i might have been laid open should for perusing Proust might have been An neuroscientist is how frequently all the Workmanship predated science. With watchful investigation under those reality of the human experience there may be extraordinary knowledge under mankind's nature, our senses, and the route our universe meets expectations. Mind blowing specialists intuited the thing that the researchers of the day didn't have confidence alternately Might not yet substantiate. With occasion when science need made up for lost time with the thing that symbolization recently knew, Be that i wonder how regularly this transaction of the two planets might have been acknowledged what's more entryway much speedier we Might have gotten here whether science seen art.
</span>
Answer:
a)148.47
b)148.34
Step-by-step explanation:
Let π(x) be the prime-counting function that gives the number of primes less than or equal to x, for any real number x. For example, π(7) = 4 because there are four prime numbers (2, 3, 5, 7) less than or equal to 7.
We can see that π(7)=π(10) because there are four prime numbers (2,3,5,7) less than or equal to 10.
A good aproximation for π(x) is x / log x, where log x is the natural logarithm of x.
a)The number of primes between 1 and 1030.
1030/log(1030)=148.47
b) The number of primes between 1 and 1029.
1029/log(1029)=148.34
Extra: π(1029)=π(1030) because 1030 is not a prime.
