A historical source is <u>biased</u> when it can be deemed unreliable because the author appears to unfairly favor a particular side or viewpoint.
<h3>What is bias?</h3>
Bias refers to a historian's perspective being strongly for or against an issue.
Historical bias refers to when the information in the source can be clearly described as <u>unfair, unbalanced, or prejudiced</u>.
Thus, a historical source is <u>biased</u> when it can be deemed unreliable because the author appears to unfairly favor a particular side or viewpoint.
Learn more about a biased historical source at brainly.com/question/1614300
#SPJ1
Answer: The battle of Antietam gave Northerners hope that they could win the war, the Emancipation provided a new reason for fighting and a new outcome to the war.
Explanation:
True. If that is what you were asking for?
Answer:
O Their archers struggled to fight the Greek infantry at close range.
Explanation:
I hope it is :) XD
The answer is Mexico. They went to war and Texas won
