Answer:
The article "The Melting Arctic" attempts to win over public opinion by making use of persuasive techniques. One such technique is the use of scientific data, which relies on proofs, graphs, and charts. The article also relies on expert opinion, which involves the endorsement of an idea or opinion by a renowned professional in that particular field.
In contrast, the NOAA video uses visuals of animals to appeal to the viewer’s emotions. It makes passionate claims about the worsening Arctic conditions and the adverse effects they have on animal life.
Explanation:
The question is not complete since it does not provide the options to complete the paragraph, here is the paragraph with the options:
Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu. (please select one of the options in parentheses, each possible answer has " around it)
The article "The Melting Arctic" attempts to win over public opinion by making use of persuasive techniques. One such technique is the use of ( "Emotional appeals", "Bandwagon", "Scientific data", "Bias"), which relies on proofs, graphs, and charts. The article also relies on ("Expert opinion", "Association", "Celebrities", "Emotional appeals"), which involves the endorsement of an idea or opinion by a renowned professional in that particular field.
In contrast, the NOAA video uses visuals of animals to appeal to the viewer’s ("Logic", "Emotions", "Ethics", "Reason"). It makes ("ILL-informed", "Frivolous", "Passionate", "illogical") claims about the worsening Arctic conditions and the adverse effects they have on animal life.
The correct words can be selected on base of the definition that comes right after them when we have relative clauses that add descriptive information of the noun that is being used in the lines, there are also some keywords, mainly when we compare the article versus the video with the word " In contrast" if the article is based on scientific data and proof the other one will be the opposite which means it has a more emotional approach.
