1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nadya68 [22]
3 years ago
10

(03.02 HC)

History
1 answer:
docker41 [41]3 years ago
5 0

The skepticism about the empire of Ghana and the accounts for it is nothing weird because the majority of what is written about it is from two people from the same place, that had totally different views and interpretations on the things, and came from different culture.

Very often in the historical text, the people that wrote something have been very subjective, not objective. Thus the writings of these two Arab geographers can be very misleading, as they described what they saw with their own eyes, but also with using their own perception. That has proven numerous times to give very inaccurate depictions of a society and culture, like the depictions of the Romans for the Celts, or of the Greeks for the Scythian female warriors that they named Amazons.

There's only one point of view unfortunately, and it is always much more reliable when multiple writings are available from people from multiple different backgrounds, or the best scenario if it is writings from the people in question.

You might be interested in
George W. bush what branch is he
CaHeK987 [17]
He was a president so he was part of the executive branch
8 0
3 years ago
Answer the two questions regarding the reconstruction
olga_2 [115]

Answer:

sorry its too small

Explanation:

you should probably leave that pic and put another one of teh questions cause when you blow it up it glitches

5 0
2 years ago
Why did Washington refuse to help France or Britain?
Nikitich [7]
Pretty sure it is E Hope it helps
6 0
3 years ago
Why did president Bush's popularity decline in the year before the 2004 election
Yuri [45]
Because of the invasion of Iraq and people did not agree with the Iraq War.
5 0
3 years ago
which best describes the significance of william and mary accepting parliament’s limitation on the monarchy’s power?
Arte-miy333 [17]
William accepted Parliament's<span> invitation to him and to </span>Mary<span> to rule in place of James. </span>William and Mary have been willing to accept the limits placed on their power because their position was not powerful enough to demand more. Hope this helps. Have a nice day.
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • hich describes how the 14th Amendment affected the balance of power in the United States? The states gained the power to declare
    7·1 answer
  • Business leaders believe that government regulation can only help the economy.
    6·1 answer
  • In the West, the completion of the transcontinental railroad greatly benefited:
    11·2 answers
  • According the jefferson, what has been the kings attitude towards the laws of colonies
    8·2 answers
  • What were the religious beliefs of the Ottawa tribe?
    13·2 answers
  • In the late 1800s, roads, buildings, and utilities were repaired in specific New York City neighborhoods when citizens voted for
    10·2 answers
  • What domestic issues did England and France have?
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following was a tax on paper goods by the British government?
    5·1 answer
  • The passage suggests that, compared to the final result, the original idea for Mount Rushmore ..A)was dreamt by Calvin Coolidge
    6·1 answer
  • Which states that granted women full voting rights prior to 1920 did not ratify the<br> era?
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!