Answer:
Hey but you get better at in no time lol
Step-by-step explanation:
no need to worry
Answer:
See the argument below
Step-by-step explanation:
I will give the argument in symbolic form, using rules of inference.
First, let's conclude c.
(1)⇒a by simplification of conjunction
a⇒¬(¬a) by double negation
¬(¬a)∧(2)⇒¬(¬c) by Modus tollens
¬(¬c)⇒c by double negation
Now, the premise (5) is equivalent to ¬d∧¬h which is one of De Morgan's laws. From simplification, we conclude ¬h. We also concluded c before, then by adjunction, we conclude c∧¬h.
An alternative approach to De Morgan's law is the following:
By contradiction proof, assume h is true.
h⇒d∨h by addition
(5)∧(d∨h)⇒¬(d∨h)∧(d∨h), a contradiction. Hence we conclude ¬h.
Answer: 280 miles I think
Step-by-step explanation:
At first, he drives 110. Then hes at the 180 mile mark. And at the end he is at 280. 110 + 70 + 100. I’m very sorry if I’m wrong.
The zeroes are
0, -5, 3 + i (and its conjugate)
The factors are
x (x + 5) (x - (3 + i)) (x - (3 - i))
Expanding...
(x² + 5x)((x - 3) - i) ((x - 3) + i)
(x² + 5x)((x - 3)² - i²)
(x² + 5x)(x² - 6x + 9 - (-1))
(x² + 5x)(x² - 6x + 10)
x⁴ - 6x³ + 10x² + 5x³ - 30x² + 50x
x⁴ - x³ - 20x² + 50x
Answer:
1) 180 is a straight line, so 180 - 118 = <em>62</em>
2) 180 degrees are in a triangle, so 180 - (62) - 73 = <em>45</em>
3) 180 is a straight line, so 180 - 73 = 107. There are 180 degrees in a triangle, so 180 - 49 - 45 = <em>86</em>
