the population growth in eastern europe is 12.6 per 1,000 people compared to 38 in sub-Saharan Africa.
South Asia is a really difficult place to try and centralize the countries. A big problem are the large populations in the countries, with the likes of India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh all being in one of the most populated countries in the world, so centralizing them would mean that hundreds of millions of people will either live on the verge of existence (even worse than it is now), or will be moving towards the city where the centralization will be taking place, and there's no such place that can function properly if that amount of people flood in it. Another problem is that there's multiple cities that are very big, with millions of people living in them, and if centralization takes place, they will start to decline in every aspect, and that will cause huge problems of all sorts on national level.
Answer:
Explanation:
you take 12 and devide it by 2 and get 6 so X = 6
Well the southeastern region other United States was essential whenEngland came and basically conquered us. It was great because it had fertile soil and a really good climate for growing tobacco, which was one of the best resources for the English to make money since they were after gold, which there wasn’t on the Easter coast of the United States.
Hope it helps!!
