Answer:
D. a rise in the gas tax makes the supply of gasoline more elastic so most of the rise in the gas tax is paid primarily by consumers, which jeopardizes the re-election of politicians
Explanation:
First of all, the demand for gasoline products is normally deemed as <em>relatively inelastic</em>, which means that the <u>percent of change in consumer demand is lower than the percent of change in the price of goods.</u>
If the gas tax and thus overall gas price becomes higher, gas supply will become slightly more elastic (not to a great extent, as gas is a limited resource).
<u>Tax inference</u> is a term implying the distribution of the tax burden between the supplier and consumer. In this case, we have a similar demand and supply elasticity. A general rule is that if we have an <em>elastic supply</em>, but <em>inelastic demand</em>, the tax is almost entirely paid by the consumer.
Even though this example shows a similar level of elasticity for both supply and demand, the bigger share of the tax burden still goes to the consumer, as the supply is still more elastic than the demand.
Therefore, imposing such taxes (no matter the reason), can provoke controversy in public discourse and create instability to the position of the politicians who made such decisions.
Answer: Like minded employees have difficulty offering fresh perspectives.
Explanation: The attraction - selection - attrition framework, or ASA framework is a model that states that people within a workplace are a function of 3 interellated elements: attraction, selection and attrition. It basically goes on to say that individuals are attracted to, selected by and kept in organisations by other employees who have the same psychological attributes as themselves. The ASA framework is then able to define the nature, processes, culture, and structure of the organisation by determining the types of individuals who work in the organisation.
Answer: Organizations with open systems exchange information and resources with their external environment. However, they manage to control these interactions by generating permeable boundaries which permit necessary exchange while being shielded from external disturbances. The interaction of the FBPS and the external environment as an open system during the closure of the Hampton and Culpeper campuses was poor and ineffective. The closure was considered abrupt to the families and the surrounding communities. The school denied intending to close following the leaked email, just to protect its administration from parents’ outrage. The school lacked healthy exchange of information with its external environment.
Complex adaptive systems refer to dynamic systems which are capable of evolving with and adapt in a changing environment . The FBPS system was surrounded by a number of changes shortly before its closure. The external environment was experiencing financial crisis, intense competition from public schools that are independently operated and chartered. The school was unable to keep up or to adapt to changes that were taking place. They gave in to competition, losing most of their students to their chartered public schools competitors.
Explanation:
