1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
irakobra [83]
3 years ago
8

Which statement might have been made by an Anti-

History
2 answers:
OLga [1]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

B. We cannot ratify the Constitution without a bill of

rights.

Explanation: Anti-Federalist opposed the ratification of the Constitution without the bill of rights. They were concerned with too much power put into the national government at the expense of states. This caused the adoption of the First Amendment and the other nine amendments that are in the Bill of Rights.

Mariulka [41]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:during debates about slavery at the constitutional convention, delegates from northern states believe that ?

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Factories allowed:
aleksandrvk [35]

The answer is C. mass production.

3 0
3 years ago
What did William E.B. DuBois encourage African Americans to do?
alex41 [277]
D. Obtain a higher education and become politically active. <span />
3 0
3 years ago
Commercialisation of agriculture was done to further the British interests’. Elaborate.
Firlakuza [10]
Commercialisation led to growth of national agriculture and agricultural problem acquired national form. It brought about regional specialization of crops on an efficient basis. Commercialisation encouraged the production of some specific crop and favourably affected their distribution.
3 0
3 years ago
Why did the ming dynasty restrict trade with europe?
vampirchik [111]
To prevent the spread of European ideas and culture in China
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Select the statements that were true of the Emancipation Proclamation. It freed very few slaves immediately. It freed the slaves
aleksklad [387]

The Emancipation Proclamation did not immediately free slaves, as the rebel states would obviously not follow the orders given by Lincoln.

Here are the true statements: -It most definitely changed the significance of the war, for after a long war, people were starting to question what they were even fighting for.

-It did not free slaves in southern held territory.

-It arguably did end the threat of English recognition of the Confederacy, and for an interesting reason. Beforehand, England had no issue with providing aid to the Confederacy. However, once Lincoln made the war also focused on slavery, it would not have looked good for England to openly support the Confederacy any more.


3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is a mission?
    6·1 answer
  • What were erik eriksons accomplishments?
    13·2 answers
  • What affect did mechanization have on farming
    7·1 answer
  • Franklin Roosevelt's: freedom speech. At least answer 1. (15+)
    5·1 answer
  • The United States and Great Britain agreed upon which of the following terms after World War II?
    7·2 answers
  • Q.7...<br>..formed the state of Jammu and Kashmir.​
    14·1 answer
  • Who is popularly known as the father of economics​
    5·1 answer
  • 7. Let’s imagine the United States was debating to bring a caste system to the country, would you protest or support the effort?
    10·1 answer
  • Venezuela's oil production has increased recently and helped their economy because of the high demand for oil.
    13·2 answers
  • The U.S. Constitution reflects the principle of individual rights because :
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!