Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
In a legal term, Dissent is defined as an opinion in at the end of a legal case written by one or more justices to express their disagreement against the viewpoint of the majority during the rulings of a court judgment.
Consequently, the purpose of dissent is to endeavors to solicit for relatively acceptable court decision. The power of dissent, however, lies in its capacity to impact the forthcoming but similar lawsuits.
Hence, the power of dissent is the ability to influence the public belief, give rise to civil societies and movement, and perhaps reverse or improve the outcome of a court judgment and legislation in the future years.
A vivid example is the case of Louis Brandeis’s 1928 dissent in Olmstead v. United States.
Answer:
the correct answer to this open question is the following North Carolina Constitution changed in the mid-nineteenth century to abolish slavery in the state and also allowed male suffrage
Explanation:
we are talking about an important moment in the history of the state of North Carolina. the people of the state ratified the Constitution of 1868 West 930,000 votes. the Constitution expanded the power of people to elect their representatives and officers.
Answer:
Explanation:
The colonies just wanted to forge a place for themselves
They wanted to live more freely and to worship how they wanted to.
sorry i dont have much info.. hope this would work tho
Answer:
the U.S. had withdrawn all its troops, the fighting in Vietnam. South Vietnam officially surrendered to North Vietnam on April 30, 1975.
IAnswer:
Im not sure how well this use of the information will help you but,
Source: "<em>In February 1962, President John F. Kennedy proclaimed an embargo on trade between the United States and Cuba, in response to certain actions taken by the Cuban government and directed the Department of Commerce and the Treasury to implement the embargo, which remains in place today. In February 1962, President John F. Kennedy proclaimed an embargo on trade between the United States and Cuba, in response to certain actions taken by the Cuban Government, and directed the Departments of Commerce and the Treasury to implement the embargo, which remains in place today. Beyond criticisms of human rights in Cuba, the United States holds $6 billion worth of financial claims against the Cuban government. The pro-embargo position is that the U.S. embargo is, in part, an appropriate response to these unaddressed claims."</em>
Paraphrasing - In February 1962, President John F. Kennedy announced an Associate in Nursing embargo on trade between U. S. and Cuba, in response to sure actions taken by the Cuban government, and directed the Department of Commerce and therefore the Treasury to implement the embargo. In February 1962, President John F. Kennedy announced an Associate in Nursing embargo on trade between u. s. and Cuba, in response to sure actions taken by the Cuban government, and directed the Department of Commerce and therefore the Treasury to implement the embargo, that remains in situ these days. on the far side of criticisms of human rights in Cuba, the U.S. holds a $6 billion value of economic claims against the Cuban government. The pro-embargo position is that the U.S. embargo is, in part, Associate in Nursing applicable response to those unaddressed claims.
Explanation:
The "source" is the information where i got it from and the "paraphrased" part is fully rewritten, ps sorry if it's a bit long and wordy! hope this helps have a great day :)
