1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sveta [45]
3 years ago
7

How did Tecumseh hope to stop white settlers from taking Native American land?

History
1 answer:
GREYUIT [131]3 years ago
5 0
Alarmed by the growing encroachment of whites squatting on Native American lands, the Shawnee Chief Tecumseh calls on all Indians to unite and resist.On this day in 1809, Tecumseh began a concerted campaign to persuade the Indians of the Old Northwest and Deep South to unite and resist. Together, Tecumseh argued, the various tribes had enough strength to stop the whites from taking further land.
You might be interested in
In your opinion, based on what you learned this Unit, were the labor unions effective in protecting workers from poor working co
irina1246 [14]

Unions have a substantial impact on the compensation and work lives of both unionized and non-unionized workers. This report presents current data on unions’ effect on wages, fringe benefits, total compensation, pay inequality, and workplace protections.

Some of the conclusions are:

Unions raise wages of unionized workers by roughly 20% and raise compensation, including both wages and benefits, by about 28%.

Unions reduce wage inequality because they raise wages more for low- and middle-wage workers than for higher-wage workers, more for blue-collar than for white-collar workers, and more for workers who do not have a college degree.

Strong unions set a pay standard that nonunion employers follow. For example, a high school graduate whose workplace is not unionized but whose industry is 25% unionized is paid 5% more than similar workers in less unionized industries.

The impact of unions on total nonunion wages is almost as large as the impact on total union wages.

The most sweeping advantage for unionized workers is in fringe benefits. Unionized workers are more likely than their nonunionized counterparts to receive paid leave, are approximately 18% to 28% more likely to have employer-provided health insurance, and are 23% to 54% more likely to be in employer-provided pension plans.

Unionized workers receive more generous health benefits than nonunionized workers. They also pay 18% lower health care deductibles and a smaller share of the costs for family coverage. In retirement, unionized workers are 24% more likely to be covered by health insurance paid for by their employer.

Unionized workers receive better pension plans. Not only are they more likely to have a guaranteed benefit in retirement, their employers contribute 28% more toward pensions.

Unionized workers receive 26% more vacation time and 14% more total paid leave (vacations and holidays).

Unions play a pivotal role both in securing legislated labor protections and rights such as safety and health, overtime, and family/medical leave and in enforcing those rights on the job. Because unionized workers are more informed, they are more likely to benefit from social insurance programs such as unemployment insurance and workers compensation. Unions are thus an intermediary institution that provides a necessary complement to legislated benefits and protections.

The union wage premium

It should come as no surprise that unions raise wages, since this has always been one of the main goals of unions and a major reason that workers seek collective bargaining. How much unions raise wages, for whom, and the consequences of unionization for workers, firms, and the economy have been studied by economists and other researchers for over a century (for example, the work of Alfred Marshall). This section presents evidence from the 1990s that unions raise the wages of unionized workers by roughly 20% and raise total compensation by about 28%.

The research literature generally finds that unionized workers’ earnings exceed those of comparable nonunion workers by about 15%, a phenomenon known as the “union wage premium.”

H. Gregg Lewis found the union wage premium to be 10% to 20% in his two well-known assessments, the first in the early 1960s (Lewis 1963) and the second more than 20 years later (Lewis 1986). Freeman and Medoff (1984) in their classic analysis, What Do Unions Do?, arrived at a similar conclusion.

Table 1 provides several estimates of the union hourly wage premium based on household and employer data from the mid- to late 1990s. All of these estimates are based on statistical analyses that control for worker and employer characteristics such as occupation, education, race, industry, and size of firm. Therefore, these estimates show how much collective bargaining raises the wages of unionized workers compared to comparable nonunionized workers.                                                                                                                                          

The Website i got the info from:https://www.epi.org/publication/briefingpapers_bp143/

4 0
3 years ago
What Advantages did the British hope to Gain by limiting westward settlement in 1763
Zepler [3.9K]
<span>By limiting westward settlement in 1763, the British hoped to gain the advantage of keeping peace between the settlers & natives, and also kept colonists where British authority was stronger. Brainliest? Thanks and you're welcome</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who formed an oligarchy?
KiRa [710]
Aristotle pioneered the use of the term as meaning rule by the rich, for which another term commonly used today is plutocracy. In the early 20th century Robert Michels developed the theory that democracies, as all large organizations, have a tendency to turn into oligarchies.
4 0
3 years ago
How harsh was american slavery?
bazaltina [42]
Really harsh. They suffered through a lot of hardship and pain throughout the years through many suffereings such as being killed and tortured and died rights.
8 0
3 years ago
Assess the claim that World War I shocked the European-centered world order but World War II destroyed it. How was World War II
natita [175]

Answer:

In simple words, Unlike WWI, which was battled in trench with machine weapons as well as biological weapons, WWII was conducted with modern weapons and equipment, with more aircraft, warships, vehicles, and submarine. During the war, special operations techniques, as well as atomic weapons and covert communications, were created.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are the branches of government
    13·2 answers
  • It is unfortunate that demonstrations are taking place in Birmingham, but it is even more unfortunate that the city's white powe
    12·2 answers
  • Why was the incidence of disease so high among civil war soldiers?
    12·1 answer
  • The quote in the Declaration of Independence stating "that governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from
    10·1 answer
  • How has telophones improved from back then
    7·1 answer
  • How did Aztec society differ from Inca society? A.) The Aztec domesticated animals for transportation purposes; the Inca didn’t.
    13·2 answers
  • How has Roman law impacted law in the United States?
    9·1 answer
  • Is new York City a rural urban or suburban community
    14·1 answer
  • What do you think was the most<br> impressive cultural achievement of the maya and why
    15·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes the connection the author draws between the efforts of the "Greatest Generation" and the American
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!